The wording in the below linked document submitted by Windsor in 2011 has some very familiar wording. Read for yourselves:
This next document from the court is very entertaining, too. For some reason, the court was suspicious of Windsor. I can't possibly imagine why! Review it as well:
Now? As we hum along to this long played diddy, here's a favorite chorus, #DENIED
This last document? I find several particularly clever and very hilarious statements. My personal favorite favorite is: "The basis for Windsor's motion is four times removed from the source."
Is that the now used Windsor-speak of "upon information and belief"?
Which really just means "I'm making this shit up and hoping it'll fly".
These documents? Prove to me that Windsor is using the same frivolous filing tactics four years later in numerous other courts. And, getting the same results.
Sing along loud now, "Vexi, vexi, vexi! Trying to play any court is just a Windsor dream!"