Search This Blog

Friday, October 30, 2015

Windsor is On #MotionWatch2015 with Facebook Simulcast

Busy! Busy! Busy! 

As we follow the BillWindsor Saga...and we can 24/7, via Windsor's Facebook page, we see he's delighted to label himself INFAMOUS.  Windsor regales readers of his posts how busy he is filing this and that, scheduling more filming, planning his next trip(s).  
Very similar to Dory, Bill can't seem to stay focused or recall what he's said from one post to the next.  One day, Windsor posts for his readers that he'll be traveling to California to get the MOVIE done.  Another day, later?  Bill is off to Carver County, Minnesota.  (Ping, ping, zip!)
Windsor celebrated the one year anniversary of his arrest on warrants out of Montana, into the Ellis County Jail this week with a (multi-edited) Facebook update.  As the days wore on this week, Bill's tone in the edits get snippy.  Bill was most likely going for menacing, as one commenter here used, came off as bitter and snippy to me.  Here, just read and see if it's menacing or snippy for yourselves: 

There we have it.  Snippy and bitter Bill Windsor "getting on with his life" after his big Montana #MotionWatch2015.  
WLYB!  Happy Anniversary!
*sources reveal that the "L" denotes loathe, upon information and belief , sources are confirmed correct*

℗ ♛ ❥ 





126 comments:

  1. Friday is usually the day!

    Or not.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Just keep swimming, just keep swimming...

    How are peanut butter and jelly sandwiches supposed to be served? Paper plate or brown paper sack sounds OK to me. Besides, upon information and belief, I think Windsor was fibbing about peanut butter sandwich for EVERY meal.


    Meals

    You will get three meals a day: breakfast, lunch and dinner. As expected, they are very basic, but healthy. A typical breakfast might be cereal, toast, coffee and fruit. Lunch might be spaghetti, salad, bread and milk. Dinner could be chicken casserole, rice, vegetables, dessert and milk. Contrary to popular belief, prison food has greatly improved over the years, and you might find that it’s not much different from what you would eat at home.

    http://prisonhandbook.com/3761/ellis-county-jail-waxahachie-tx/

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bill has no life and lives vicariously through others. Couldn't hack it in the real world so he created a fake one online. This time waiting for the courts his pushing him further down the rabbit hole as we watch him rapidly cycle between bouts of mania and depression.
    The reason he lies to his lemmings is in part due to his delusions and in part to control the relationship so it always revolves around himself. He created a shifting false persona for how he wants people to see him: a cowboy, producer, author, etc, but deep inside he knows its not real so he must blame others for exposing him.
    These are his role models: the profane, the anti-establishment, the rapists and the murderers. He is drawn to violence but knows he can't just come out and say that which causes him anxiety. So he will manipulate the situation. He posts a story about Jerrod the pedophile and makes sure it's ok for his lemmings to draw the comparison. Children were harmed, but all that matters is Bill gets attention when pedophilia is mentioned. And his anxiety is momentarily appeased.
    Take everything he writes with a grain of sand. This is all about him and how he wants to control you to think. He doesn't have long to live and no one is going to stalk people for him once he is dead. That is just his mania talking. He doesn't want to believe that his life is just that insignificant.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'll buy into that analysis.

      Delete
    2. Yeah, wow, Anon! You're good.

      ℗ ♛ ❥

      Delete
  4. #MotionWatch2015 BREAKING NEWS per Windsor: 3 of charges dismissed, but the TOP was valid.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Apparently, the slam dunk was not a factor in that decision.

      Delete
    2. Party time!

      Now to find a lot lizard that accepts AmEx and doesn't get spooked by the tether...

      Delete
    3. Not Friends Of Bill WindsorOctober 30, 2015 at 11:06 AM

      LOL yeah, that was the whole point he and his "legal eagle" vexatious moron were hinging on. Point blank, they completely disregarded the statute that upheld it while he tried to play his frivolous games.

      Delete
    4. "I haven't had time to read it yet."
      Are you kidding, Billy,you have been waiting weeks for this and when it arrives you can't find the time to read it? LOL, we know you have read and memorized it, just wondering why you're not posting it.

      Delete
    5. The order is posted. Three charges are dismissed. But the judge does take a few shots at Windsor. He refers to his filings as his "chirping". And my favorite part, he refers to his legal expert's legal claims in the great slam dunk brief as "absurd". Of course, all of that will still get spun into an "I was right" tirade.

      Delete
    6. Yeah, that is the best part of this. Collectively their puffery blew up in their faces. They had NO merit in their assertion of twisting the statutes. That? Is hilarious.

      Windsor may have been able to skate on some charges, but then again, perhaps the Judge was just showing the DA what points need to be solidified so the Jury isn't confused by Windsor's evident snow job. The only way Windsor can get around violating laws, is by burying the evidence that proves his guilt under mountains of crappy, frivolous, and meritless "Chirping" filings.

      As SCA brings up below, going back to the simplest forms of the TOP is necessary to bring back the charges and not looking into Windsor's dog and pony excuses. The attacks and harassment were due to on line antics. He violated those, and the most glaring violation should have been the DA requesting a "Tampering with Evidence" charge ON TOP of the current charges for altering that video he tweeted.

      Delete
  5. Second-Chair AttorneyOctober 30, 2015 at 11:51 AM

    I'm a bit shocked by this opinion -- but only because so much of it hinges on apparently difficult-to-read handwriting on the Temporary Order of Protection.

    On Page Two of that order, it appears relatively clear (to me, at least) that Windsor was directed not to "post Petitioner[']s name online." In fact, I thought it was frivolous when Windsor moved to dismiss some of the charges against him because he claimed he could not read this portion of the Temporary Order of Protection. Boushie's application was in large part about online harassment, and this directive addressed that.

    Yet in substantial part throughout the Opinion and Order issued yesterday, Judge Haynes concludes the he can't understand what this portion of the Temporary Order of Protection says, means, or does -- referring to the directive as prohibiting Windsor from "post[ing] Petitioners name on l.u [sic]" and calling that a "vague and unintelligible prohibition" that can't be enforced, and that any violations of which can't give rise to prosecution or conviction.

    Incredibly, apparently the State did not give him any guidance -- Judge Haynes notes, on the line stretching from Pages Eight to Nine of the Opinion and Order, that the State did not endeavor to explain that line of the Temporary Order of Protection in its filings.

    But if Judge Haynes understood that the directive prohibited Windsor from posting Boushie's name online in any way, then Windsor has admitted publishing Boushie's name online, and he should be in violation of that directive, given the Court's other rulings about the Temporary Order of Protection having been in full force and effect throughout this ordeal.

    Why wouldn't the State have addressed this point? Could they read the Temporary Order of Protection as clearly as I could, and did they disregard Windsor's argument on this point as a result? Importantly, can they ask Judge Haynes to reconsider the Opinion and Order by pointing out what the Temporary Order of Protection appears to clearly (although slightly illegibly) say?

    If this point were to get reconsidered and resolved in favor of the State, Counts I, II, and IV, to me, appear to come back into play. I guess we'll see how serious the State is in pursuing this prosecution now that some frankly unlikely turns of event have borne out against it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "On Page Two of that order, it appears relatively clear (to me, at least) that Windsor was directed not to "post Petitioner[']s name online."

      That seems to have been clear to everyone but Windsor and Judge Haynes. I wonder if the State didn't address that point because it didn't appear explanation was needed.

      Delete
    2. Right. Windsor looks for the loop holes first in committing the offense and then again in getting the charges dismissed. In prosecuting him, there is no room for error or vagueness.

      Delete
    3. Second-Chair AttorneyOctober 30, 2015 at 1:18 PM

      Ida,

      Your point is a much clearer way of saying what I was trying to say above: that perhaps the State's attorneys "[c]ould . . . read the Temporary Order of Protection as clearly as I could, and . . . disregard[ed] Windsor's argument" about the Temporary Order of Protection being materially illegible "as a result[.]"

      If they did, though -- they shouldn't have.

      Delete
    4. My bet is the ADA is young enough not to have anticipated the need to argue something that appears obvious against someone like Windsor. Windsor probably functions at a level higher than most defendants the ADA prosecutes, in addition to using so much BS with intent to baffle.

      Delete
    5. Looks to me like the Montana Supreme Court had no difficulty reading the intent of the protective order. They decided the typo meant ONLINE. Perhaps Ms Clark can point that out. Montana is fixing to receive years upon years of grief from Bill Windsor as a result of this one judge's weird ruling. They had an opportunity to end it. Maybe they deserve what's coming.

      Delete
  6. SCA,

    As we know from his past, Windsor reserves the right to the "second, third and Nth bite at the ol' legal apple." Doesn't the state have that right as well? For instance, Boushie has documented hundreds of violations of the TOP by Windsor; would it not be possible for the state to add twenty or so of them to the case and continue to prosecute?

    Thanks so much for your insight and contribution to this blog!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, thank you @SCA~
      I'm re-reading the Order and maybe I'm reading it incorrectly? It's not a "slam dunk", do the happy dance moment for Windsor, yet.
      Judge was rather sharp towards Windsor numerous times.
      Absurd? Ouch

      Delete
    2. I was wondering that too, doesn't the State have a right to add additional charges and straighten out the "lu" thing?

      But the best news is all this is that the troll we all love to hate is, by legal opinion, proven absolutely WRONG. Just as was pointed out to her here, over and over again. Windsor's own "actions deprived" himself of the hearing within 20 days and the TOP remained in effect until Boushie requested dismissal.

      Delete
    3. And what about the new sites Windsor set up to harass Boushie? He transferred all of the data from the boushie.com site to another one called University of Montana Employee or something along that line. If this site was set up during the time the TOP was in effect, seems it should also be subject to surrender to Boushie. Windsor shouldn't be allowed to win with a shell game.

      Delete
    4. Second-Chair AttorneyOctober 30, 2015 at 1:25 PM

      It will be hard for the State to add charges based on other violations of the Temporary Order of Protection that occurred online given what Judge Haynes has ruled about the portion of the order that he can't read.

      But most courts allow motions for reconsideration, so long as they're filed within a specified (usually short) period of time after the original ruling and actually raise something new. The State could pursue such a motion here, asking Judge Haynes to change his mind, and maybe even bring in affidavit testimony from Boushie about what he wrote on that Temporary Order of Protection before it was entered.

      In short, there should be a way to clean this up -- I'm just surprised it's coming to this.

      On the other responses -- the Opinion and Order is not a total slam dunk for Windsor, but there are some real wins here. He notes that getting the charges reduced from five counts to two has real consequences for the misdemeanor/felony classification under Montana's laws regarding protective orders (and their violation), and thus on sentencing.

      But Windsor still has a criminal trial coming up, and I imagine the State could still try to get the dismissed charges reinstated.

      And even if all of the charges are eventually dismissed, I think we all have at least a sneaking suspicion that "Lawless America: The Movie" isn't coming to theaters near us anytime soon. That may be more entertaining than anything: watching Windsor come up with new excuses why he can't finish the movie that he has promised for months (years!) to these poor people who have chosen to follow him, once the ubiquitous "I'm being hounded by corrupt state officials" dodge falls away.

      Delete
    5. I am wondering if there are transcripts to the hearings on the verbiage in the TOP. Perhaps the DA could investigate the part, which may clear up the typo's or the "unclear" wording. Windsor knew damn well he couldn't post on line, anything about Boushie. He claimed repeatidly that if "Posting this things name is a violation of the order, then perhaps they will arrest me. Nothing else has gotten media attention." (or similar wording) This to me, clearly shows Windsor's understanding of what he could or couldn't do during the TOP was clear, and he purposely violated it, just provoking them to arrest him.

      It doesn't seem difficult in that regard to get the Judge to reconsider dismissing those charges when Windsor's own admittance of what was violating the order was, regardless of what he wrote in his "please your honor, get me out of this, so I can continue suing, and posting for the rest of my life, anything and everything I want."

      Delete
    6. Doesn't Windsor own a domain in Judge Haynes' name already?

      Delete
    7. "I'm being hounded by corrupt state officials"

      Yeah, a little off topic but along those lines: I was wondering over night why Windsor has been mute regarding all the Piccone business. That mess seems to be a perfect soap box for Windsor. In 2012 Windsor was all over Piccone's problems with CPS. Windsor said Piccone's CPS case was an example of "...professional misconduct, lies, procedural errors, incompetence, denial of civil and constitutional rights...". Now he can add accusations of judicial and law enforcement corruption. Piccone said in his complaint Piccone vs USPTO et al, that he and Windsor are being unfairly prosecuted.

      The only ingredients missing are violence and child molestation, so maybe it all feeds back to the analysis posted at 9:54 AM. Otherwise, why would Windsor have dumped such perfect issues to rant about?

      Delete
  7. Where is Judge Thrash? Taking care of business for his constituents, and he can not allow a vexi to take him away from that task. I think at this point it is naive to think Thrash doesn't know what Bill is up to. Why not call him back to Georgia? Because the pennies that Bill feeds into the court do not pay for the mess he makes. The biggest reason he is free IMO is that no one wants to pay for his room and board permanently. Bill's life is proving that the court system is unable to protect itself from abuse and each person who slaps his hand is part of that. The VL term is not a punitive term, nor a restraint. It is simply a warning to those who are lucky enough to know about it. The warning simply states: Buyer Beware.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree, Judge Thrash cannot babysit Windsor. Thrash did his part. The courts need a data base that list VLs.

      Delete
  8. This is good and bad. Good because people will not have to worry that someone will say oh you are harassing me when posting an opinion. Bad because morons like Whiney Boy can possibly have carte blanche to do and say whatever they want to say and get away with it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Huh? Who cares about a simple harassment post? So you call me a "poopy head" on line. So what? The issue is that Windsor sues and sues and sues, and that's extremely expensive and disruptive. Yes, to continue to prosecute Windsor in MT will be costly, but NOT prosecuting him will be even more expensive and disruptive in the long run. We all know what happens when Windsor thinks he's "won." You can bet he's gearing up to sue MT and everyone in it for every tort under the sun (which he will naturally confuse as a crime).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes. Missoula just became a good site for a paper recycling mill. I wonder, though, if Windsor still insists he's done nothing wrong, can we expect him back at the University of Montana, eBay bulletproof vest donned for more not-stalking? Maybe SB has changed vehicles! That's due an expose', surely!

      Delete
  10. While windsor maintains seandfleming.net I will maintain billwindsor.net it will be that way until he releases my name and stops publishing lies about me. Soon I will be publishing true information about him there. Nothing like Freedom of Speech to correct what is lied about.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Right. I can't believe the court would even entertain the idea that Windsor's targets should have to pay him for the release of these websites even while admitting that the stalking occurred.

      Delete
    2. However, we can play hard ball with that position. Windsor wants to call them property? We can prove they are weapons he used to stalk people and that they should be confiscated. Assign a monetary value to them. Fine. We can demand that the offending blogs be turned over to each individual against the monetary judgement owed to each of us when Texas declared this a free speech issue.

      Delete
  11. "Bill Windsor

    Now I can focus on joeys"

    Focus away asshole, we all saw how well that worked out for you last time. At least now he's giving the lemmings his next excuse for not finishing his imaginary movie. Hurry back to Texas Bill, really focus!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I didn't read a word about removing ankle monitor or cancelling trial.
      Windsor has said repeatedly he can travel now. What's stopping him from going wherever? Why hasn't he gone to Texas?
      Ol Vexi Short Britches might want to read that order one more time.

      Delete
    2. Exactly. I'll finish the movie once I'm through suing Montana, Idaho, Texas, the Joeys and I'll throw in Maid of the Mist again because if I've won once it's retroactive and I've won everything. That's my new rule. Whu? Movie? Who said anything about a movie?

      Delete
    3. Doesn't he owe money to Sean F and others from his Texas case against the "Joey's" that he lost so miserably?
      Maybe, he should focus on paying them their $$$$$$$ !!

      Delete
    4. This is how Windsor gets around the stuff he doesn't like or want to read. He told the lemmings this about the order:

      He got a lot of the facts wrong and ignored the excellent law that I presented. So, don't take pages 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 at face value.

      Delete
    5. Giggle! That is the short version of BillSchit today! Snickering at Ida!

      Delete
  12. Let's go to the Clubhouse!!
    Hurry!

    http://joeyisalittlekid.blogspot.com/2015/10/windsors-slam-dunk-comes-back-in-his.html?m=1#comment-form

    ReplyDelete
  13. Huh...I think you mean, "let's go to the hop!"

    ReplyDelete
  14. Question - Is there a reason why Windsor was never criminally charged with stalking the Boushie's back in August 2013?

    Montana Code Annotated 2015
    Search · MCA Contents
    http://leg.mt.gov/bills/mca_toc/45_5_2.htm
    Table of Contents
    TITLE 45. CRIMES
    CHAPTER 5. OFFENSES AGAINST THE PERSON
    Part 2. Assault and Related Offenses
    Back Up One Level in Table of Contents
    45-5-201. Assault.
    45-5-202. Aggravated assault.
    45-5-203. Intimidation.
    45-5-204. Mistreating prisoners.
    45-5-205. Negligent vehicular assault -- penalty.
    45-5-206. Partner or family member assault -- penalty.
    45-5-207. Criminal endangerment -- penalty.
    45-5-208. Negligent endangerment -- penalty.
    45-5-209. Partner or family member assault -- no contact order -- notice -- violation of order -- penalty.
    45-5-210. Assault on peace officer or judicial officer.
    45-5-211. Assault upon sports official.
    45-5-212. Assault on minor.
    45-5-213. Assault with weapon.
    45-5-214. Assault with bodily fluid.
    45-5-215. through reserved.
    45-5-220. Stalking -- exemption -- penalty.
    45-5-221. Malicious intimidation or harassment relating to civil or human rights -- penalty.
    45-5-222. Sentence enhancement -- offenses committed because of victim's race, creed, religion, color, national origin, or involvement in civil rights or human rights activities.
    45-5-223. Surreptitious visual observation or recordation -- place of residence -- public place -- exceptions.
    45-5-224. through reserved.
    45-5-231. Definitions.
    45-5-232. Offender intervention counseling referral.
    45-5-233. Report to court or probation officer.
    45-5-234. Offender intervention counseling confidentiality.

    ReplyDelete
  15. See, the reason I have billwindsor.net is because I can and it is constitutionally mine where I can expose bill but also where I will be posting a static page of my winning document stating he lost the case. That is public information. It will also be public information on his credit report that he owes it until it's taken off.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good for you Flemming. Now, that you've got it, twist & go up. Hard. Real hard.

      Delete
    2. That's creative, but how effective will it be at his age and with his ability to get cash for what he wants? I'm betting he's too lazy to check his report to begin with. Keeping the pressure on him will piss him off. though. To get his money though, your gonna have to freeze his accounts. Which would be why he "divorced" and "retired" so many times. I'm thinking Windsor doesn't have the brain power to care about practical things like credit scores. You are going to have to him him hard, and it might be best not to advertise how you will do this until it's done.

      Delete
    3. Flemming? My sons were playing guitars earlier & we improvised a snippet for you. Elicited lots of laughter, too. We may finish it later. We'll VINE it.
      "I fought the Lawless and I WON!"

      Delete
  16. Windsor posted this response with regard to a comment about "Joeys":

    Bill Windsor "They have not yet even begun to experience butthurt. They orchestrated this bullsh*t."

    How did anyone other than Windsor and Boushie orchestrate this spectacle? Somebody points out that Boushie invited Windsor to Montana. So what if Boushie did? How was anybody other than Windsor responsible for Windsor's decision to go? How was anybody else responsible for publicizing the event and creating a spectacle?

    Like any sports spectacle, Windsor has followers that cheer him and followers that jeer him. Other than people Windsor stalked and harassed before, the people jeering him have absolutely no investment in whether any or all of the charges against him are dropped. It's just a curiosity, nothing more than on-line entertainment that Windsor created. Regardless of the outcome, Boushie's complaints appear to have stopped Windsor's physical stalking adventures. And that is a WIN! for all of Windsor's victims.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bill was openly stalking people going to their home, trying to catch them at restaurant where they eat at..... Bill was all over online saying Boushie was next, he was going to do whatever to scare him, that is when Boushie said bring it on, called him a coward and was trying to stand up to Windsor terrorizing a group of women.... Boushie was doing, what a lot of good men do when they see a woman being abuse, he was trying to get Bill Windsor to take him on, take on another man because Bill Windsor was a coward going after these women saying he was going to help men in jail for trying to killed their child win custody because he hated these women for calling him out for running a con job..... let not rewrite history, Boushie was trying to get Bill to stop Terrorizing these women. I agree with Ida Claire Boushie did stop Bill from going to people home and scaring the hell out of their Family.....

      Delete
    2. When they arrested him and found his expired drivers license--wouldn't they have confiscated that? Legally? So who has given him a legal license to drive since he got out of jail? Maybe it's time for someone to pull him over and send him to jail if he is driving without a license, especially when he is admittedly driving recklessly.

      Delete
    3. He has a valid SD D/L. He had it on him when he was arrested. So......

      Delete
    4. I remember reading it was invalid or revoked? Guess I remembered wrong.

      Delete
    5. Driving without a license is a citation, and not a "go to jail", in most states, unless it's driving while license suspend or DUI/DWI, or an accident has occurred. If there is a licensed driver in the vehicle, the officer issues a citation and the vehicle is released to leave with licensed driver, otherwise, vehicle is towed and impounded, in addition to citation.
      My question to those that keep bringing up Windsor's DL, who would you call? What state? What law enforcement agency in that state? What would you say, if and when you called? That you're in ______, and you know this man is driving in ________, and you suspect he has no valid DL? I mean, how does that all go down? I don't think Windsor should be behind the wheel either because of his unsteadiness and his recent claims of dizziness and inability to turn his head. That being said, I still don't know how anyone could get law enforcement to conduct a traffic stop unless the caller had actually seen Windsor driving immediately prior to call.
      Sorry. This has been mentioned a few times.

      Delete
    6. In Windsor's arrest report, it clearly states he was carrying an expired Georgia D/L and a valid SD D/L.

      Delete
    7. Just in case ankle bracelet wearing Billschit decides to delete his "They have not yet even begun to experience butthurt" comment, here's the forever and ever link:
      https://www.facebook.com/billwindsor1/posts/10208214142777826?comment_id=10208217359258236&reply_comment_id=10208217374218610&total_comments=2&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R9%22%7D

      Delete
    8. Uh, why would he delete that comment? Is it now illegal to threaten to inflict butt hurt on someone? Or is the actual infliction of said butt hurt illegal? Because if it is, there are several here who could be in big trouble.

      Delete
    9. Anon@9:55AM

      I really don't think that Windsor who previously took a gun cross county to stalk the Boushies is in the position to be threatening anyone. Period.

      "Coupled with Windsor's harassing words via the internet were the actions of Windsor bringing a gun from Georgia to Montana, Windsor physically appearing at Boushie's place of employment and Windsor appearing at Boushie's how, which justified the issuance of the 8/23/13 TOP..." [Montana Cause #DC2014-509. Order and Opinion. 10-29-2015. MT Ravalli County Judge James Haynes. Page 8]

      Delete
    10. Renee, you maybe should consider looking up the definition of butt hurt. If you consider the intention of inflicting butt hurt a viable threat, you might be an idiot. Just sayin.

      Delete
    11. Windsor already got his but hurt. Does he want that to happen again, im sure. What will never change is that the movie is non existent.

      Delete
    12. Just because Windsor isn't terribly original in his veiled threats, and uses the term "Butthurt"( because that is the term used to describe him,) doesn't necessarily mean when he says it, it's not actionable as a threat.

      Take into account the other hundreds of promises he's made to get even with people, and that "butthurt" is clearly understood as his intent to keep harassing people via frivolous lawsuits.

      Windsor-- "367 days of torture and uncertainty. Time to return some "favors."

      "There was one plus to being unlawfully incarcerated by the Ellis County Mafia. Bill got to see the sleazy, slimy, sick, criminals who head up the Joeyisalittlekid Gang. They tried to hide in the back of the courtrooms, but Bill spotted them. He will be pursuing them legally and exposing them online for the rest of his life. And when he croaks, he hopes someone else will pick up the cause."

      "Never get in a fight with someone who has nothing to lose..... So, I will go after each and every one of the crooks and sickos with everything I've got."

      Windsor has made it well known that using the court, and the internet is his weapon. While he can and will sue about opinions he doesn't like on the internet, he will create websites with malicious intent, in violation of the TOS of purchasing them, (or as he wants to claim now, getting others to purchase for him so he doesn't technically own them) just as he explained years ago to his followers to harass, and defame Judges.

      Windsor's definition of "Expose," "News," and "Media," is obviously warped. Also actually going to film people under the guise of "Media" which he claims is "Constitutionally protected" for the sole purpose of harassment is a privacy threat to anyone who doesn't agree, or give permission to be filmed. It has been mentioned before that Windsor did film and acknowledged specific people were DV victims and protected, yet, when he got mad, he turned around and posted their personal information on line. That doesn't seem professional or legal for a "Media" outlet.

      It's not just about specific wording, it's Windsor's actions as a whole and his promises to continue on harassing people until he dies, and even then, hoping one of the danglers will continue on for him. We've seen such danglers step up in Cox, the Troll "legal expert", and various others Windsor calls "Friends Of Bill Windsor."

      Another interesting point is his intent to continue on with what appears the Sov Cit attacks on Judges. Once again, he admits he has secret (changing the words now to special) people working behind the scenes, of which some alleged "success" has taken place. Just how deep "behind the scenes" are the true Windsor Sov Cit followers, and not the smoke and mirror "Movie" shills?

      " I have been working with a special group of people on an ant-corruption project in one state. The goal is to make a SIGNIFICANT impact on corrupt judges. It it works there, it is absolutely a program that can be easily rolled out to folks in every state. The program worked in one initial effort involving one judge. Next we try it with a bunch of judges. Would you be happy if your corrupt judge was removed from office? That's the goal. Stay tuned. And, email bill@billwindsor.com with REMOVE MY JUDGE in ALL CAPS in the Subject Line. Send the judge's full legal name, name of his or her court, address of the courthouse, and a link to the court's website. Send as many as you like. We will put the emails into a folder, and if the program rolls out to your state, you will be included."

      Delete
    13. So you're actually saying that Windsor's threat to cause people more butt hurt is actionable? All I can say to that is wow! That's the equivalent of saying Mary D's claims of Boushie's "veiled, big knife" threats against her are actionable.

      Delete
    14. We (here) are 'squabbling', bantering back & forth, over what we already know.
      Normal individuals can do that, have a differing opinion and 'squabble', get 'butthurt' and go on with life.
      We here, also all know that Windsor's definition of inflicting 'butthurt' is far different. It's criminal.

      Delete
    15. I am saying that Windsor's definition of "Butthurt" is suing people with relentless attacks of litigation in multiple states. He's saying we haven't experience butthurt yet. Which means he intends to continue inflicting his wrath of meritless, frivolous vexatious litigation.

      That is way different that saying Windsor IS butthurt because he doesn't like comments and unfavorable rulings. Not sure why you're having difficulty understanding that difference, and focusing on a word.

      Delete
    16. Maybe, just maybe ... Windsor is playing right into Ms. Clark's, Judge Haynes, and various other LE (Ellis Co) hands ... you know the old saying " give him enough rope, he'll hang himself"
      In his bloated boasting about his "victory" in Montana, he is proving he is and was stalking SB, he is proving he will continue to harass and stalk his perceived enemies "the Joey's" ...
      judges, LE,and prosecutors across America.
      I won't be surprised if new charges are brought against him and he finds himself in more legal trouble than ever before. Just a thought.

      Delete
    17. Ninja, I'm having absolutely no trouble understanding your point. That being said, this entire conversation started because someone felt it was important to screen shot and save a comment about BUTT HURT. That's exactly why I fixated on that word. Please give me any logical reason Windsor would feel the need to delete that comment out of fear of some sort of prosecution for it. What part aren't you understanding?

      Delete
    18. I'll go one step further. The constant search to turn anything Windsor posts into some sort of criminal statement along with feeling the need to save everything the ass types is ridiculous. Please tell me any place that statement could possibly be used against Windsor in any way and I'll bow to your greater intelligence on this subject. But please keep your response focused on EXACTLY what words he used and how those EXACT words are somehow criminal or nefarious.

      Delete
    19. Ok, well, you weren't clear that your contention was about saving or deleting the comment, and appeared to be the words Butthurt. My point was the words used--specifically "They haven't begin to experience Butthurt yet" being actionable as in that word "experience" indicates he plans on doing whatever he wants to inflict wrath to punish people.

      This is the comment I was referencing from you in my first comment. "AnonymousOctober 31, 2015 at 9:55 AM
      Uh, why would he delete that comment? Is it now illegal to threaten to inflict butt hurt on someone? Or is the actual infliction of said butt hurt illegal? Because if it is, there are several here who could be in big trouble."

      I'd further like to state that Windsor's actions towards Boushie, which was his infliction of harassment (his definition of Butthurt obviously) through videos, stalking and civil suits and Boushies TOP violations--that could be possibly considered actionable.

      Windsor's been harassing and suing Boushie in numerous courts after being denied infliction of making Boushie suffer Butthurt in MT, by listing him in numerous other civil suits across the US.

      It's Windsor actions to "inflict butthurt" through more frivolous litigation, websites, filming and possible stalking to which I was referring as "Actionable." Just exactly what is his intent to purposefully cause, create or inflict butturt on people vs people being simply butthurt over a comment.

      Anyway....moving on.

      Delete
    20. And I agree with the point that Windsor would not delete the comment as he loves his blustery threats to inflict as much misery as he can towards people he doesn't like.

      Delete
    21. Let's all pause for a moment to think about the fact that he is still facing a criminal trial and still wearing a GPS ankle bracelet.
      Just because he is claiming "Game Over" in reality the game has not started, yet.. and doesn't until January.
      Apparently he can't comprehend that he is still being charged and considered a criminal..

      Delete
    22. Let's putt it this way: when Windsor rightly gets his butt-hurt butt permanently placed in jail for stalking someone with a gun---then you can shame his targets for saving his veiled and unveiled threats. Obviously when the court isn't functioning well enough to observe his anti-government slant and his many improbable and insane conspiracy theories within his own court filings, then some people will want to preserve a record of what the stalker does outside court. Although the more insane his court filings become, the less those screenshots are needed. Let's work together on this and not fight each other over how anyone will choose to fight them when he comes to their state, shall we?

      Delete

    23. Anonymous October 31, 2015 at 12:24 PM:
      "The constant search to turn anything Windsor posts into some sort of criminal statement along with feeling the need to save everything the ass types is ridiculous...."

      I suggest you read -
      Anonymous October 31, 2015 at 7:35 AM
      This person obviously had concern about Windsor's intentions.

      Not everyone knows how to obtain the perma - link for a FB post or comment - so I went ahead and posted it - because Windsor has deleted items from his FB and LA.com in the past.

      RE: Windsor's intentions or his meaning of "Butthurt" - Windsor is unpredictable - just like any abuser.

      Delete
    24. Ok Renee, I give up. I'm sure the commenter at 7:35 greatly appreciated your link to a comment about butthurt on Windsor's page. We all thank you for saving her from any actions Windsor might take towards her that he's referencing when he says more butthurt is coming. You should also send your link to Patrick Wilson and ask what he plans on doing about this veiled threat. You've done your heroic deed for today. Can you also post a link to his Facebook comments about partying like a rock star. They could be construed as a threat that he's going to trash his hotel room. I'm sure the Marriott would like the heads up.

      Delete
    25. Windsor's intentions have never waivered. He intends to be a Vexi assrag, suing WillyNilly, and pretend he's going to make a movie that is being sabotaged by imaginary kangaroos nationwide.

      Can we move on? Now? I only have an hour before I have to squeeze into my Little Mermaid costume and that's a trick with winter coat on.
      Happy Halloween!
      P.S. Blogger is a bit glitchy, so be patient if you're trying to comment and it won't do anything:/ Copy, log out & try again.

      ℗ ♛ ❥

      Delete
    26. Let's talk about what paranoid schizophrenia is not. It's not about the desire to protect oneself by keeping watch on a known abuser, even if other people do not understand that activity.

      Some actual signs and symptoms:
      Parkinson like tremors, insomnia, hypersensitivity to criticism, anxiety, rapidly changing mood, sudden anger, inability to hold jobs, dropping out of activities and life in general, inability to cope with minor problems, impairment in work, family and other social situations, drug or alcohol abuse, inability to set and achieve goals, poor memory, nonsensical logic, thinking people are working together to harass you, delusions of grandeur, audio and visual hallucinations, thinking people are spying on you, believing the government is out to get you....etc.

      Are paranoid schizophrenics violent---not usually says the research. However, if Bill has this then despite his inability to live life (low-functioning) he is still high functioning enough to hold the entire judicial system at bay for their refusal to address his obvious paranoid delusions before moving any further. And we would have to really get into criminal behavior studies to know just how dangerous a rich paranoid schizophrenic is when he is the leader of a group of cult-like followers.

      Delete
    27. To pt the issue of BW's drivers license(s) - here's the snippet from the police report:

      http://oi66.tinypic.com/rwjdhx.jpg

      Delete
    28. This comment was posted at 7:35 AM:

      “…let not rewrite history, Boushie was trying to get Bill to stop Terrorizing these women. I agree with Ida Claire Boushie did stop Bill from going to people home and scaring the hell out of their Family.....:”

      I was going to let it go, but I just can’t. To clarify my comment @ 6:36 AM: It took only Boushie and Windsor to create the mess in Montana. If Windsor had not physically stalked Boushie, Boushie would not have had grounds for the TOP. The DA and police department weren’t sitting around watching to see if Windsor would violate the TOP or offend Boushie again. Without a complaint from Boushie that Windsor violated the TOP, an arrest warrant would not have been issued.

      Anon @7:53 AM: you can thank the women’s rights groups that have fought so hard to protect domestic violence victims for the laws that Boushie applied to protect himself and Mrs. Boushie. There was a history between Windsor and Boushie before I don’t see Boushie’s invitation to Windsor as heroic, or even gentlemanly, by any stretch. Windsor physically stalked women and MEN for whatever butt-hurt justified it in his mind. Some of the other stalking targets were taking the same steps as necessary to protect themselves. Windsor gave Boushie better timing and ammo, so Boushie did it first. Boushie’s complaints may cause Windsor to stop himself from that kind of activity. It got real, he can end up in jail again if he keeps it up.

      Delete
    29. Sorry, I was distracted in the middle of my thought then didn't proof read before hitting the publish button. I meant to say: There was a history between Windsor and Boushie before Windsor physically stalked women and MEN for whatever butt-hurt justified it in his mind. I don’t see Boushie’s invitation to Windsor as heroic, or even gentlemanly, by any stretch.

      Delete
  17. Whatever happened to all these 'supposed' supporters?

    [IMG]http://i63.tinypic.com/elbn5z.jpg[/IMG]

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That circus would never fly, but all those people? At the rate Bill sues his followers and claims they were all in on it from the beginning. Yep. Begging to be subpoenaed years later, if they can be found, to see if they still feel the same.

      Delete
    2. Let's give a big Back40 wave to the 6 Lawless America loyal followers that are currently hanging on the gate! From Seattle (let us pray) to RhodeIsland (cheers)!
      ~~~waving~~~Happy Halloween~~~
      ℗ ♛ ❥

      Delete
    3. Robert Cookout IIIOctober 31, 2015 at 5:22 PM

      ON EART AS IT IS IN HEAVEN. AMEN!

      Delete
  18. Bill Windsor
    Rumor has it that someone else is about to file a lawsuit against them. I have filed a new one. And I am going to work with every realistic law enforcement agency I can find to try to get federal criminal charges against the Joeys and their partners in crime.
    More · 25 minutes ago

    Bill Windsor
    And Ellis County District Attorney Patrick Wilson, Ellis County Sheriff Johnny Brown, and the Ellis County judges are at the top of my list along with attorney Barbara Hachenburg.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So is he filming more people, finishing the movie, or suing the entire state of Texas? And has anyone been served this alleged new lawsuit he filed? I call Pffftt.

      Delete
    2. Bwahahahahahaha! BarbH? Bwhahahahaha! That cute little litigator will chomp his Vextacious, frivolous, fat ass up in no time and never crinkle her designer suit.
      That's funny! BarbH! Bwahahahahahaha!

      Delete
    3. Robert Cookout IIIOctober 31, 2015 at 6:17 PM

      I'm sure he'd have much better luck suing Patrick Wilson and all the judges in Ellis Co.

      Delete
    4. Yes! Oh, the scenarios of funny are endless!

      Delete
    5. You know...the visual I keep getting now, after all these years, is Windfart, with his big fat bloated face, cheeks full of air, huffing and puffing until he is dizzy and falls the fuck back. Now, lying on the ground, he starts whaling back and forth, kicking his tiny girlie feet and pounding his fist on the ground. Then, he pouts for a hot second, gets back up and starts all over again.

      As for the scunt? His new sidekick and vexi bestie? There is a song for her, goes to the tune of smelly cat...but the lyrics are not for public eyes.

      Delete
    6. A realistic law enforcement agency? As opposed to the fake one in his head that he can order about? Pbbttt. He has 2 months and 4 days till the January 4th court date. He needs to be writing up New Years Resolutions about how to get along with his life-long cell mates.

      Delete
    7. Anon? You do realize the maximum penalty on his remaining misdemeanor charges is 6 months in jail and/or a $500 fine?

      Delete
    8. Oceans says Trick or TreatOctober 31, 2015 at 7:10 PM

      LOL, thanks Ninja ROFL I always picture him holding his breath and stomping his tiny feet, wearing short 'cos he doesn't own big boy long pants. When his face turns purple, he takes another breath and stomps again... and the cycle repeats HAHAHAHAHA

      Delete
    9. ~~~waving at Oceans~~~
      Happy Halloween!

      ℗ ♛ ❥

      Delete
    10. Oh dear. Do not google "fat adult baby." Or at least not with a drink in your hand.

      Delete
    11. Bill Windsor
      And Ellis County District Attorney Patrick Wilson, Ellis County Sheriff Johnny Brown, and the Ellis County judges are at the top of my list along with attorney Barbara Hachenburg.

      LMAO - that's just as amusing this morning as it was when I read it last night.

      Delete
    12. Sometimes I go to DA Wilson's Facebook & Twitter pages just to LOL at the Windsor "WANTED" posters that DA Wilson has posted on both sites.
      Will Windsor demand DA Wilson remove those posts? Lol'ing even more at that thought.

      Delete
  19. Frank Lee BillsadickNovember 1, 2015 at 8:31 AM

    Bill Windsor-- They have not yet even begun to experience butthurt. They orchestrated this bullsh*t.

    WTF? Orchestrated what exactly? Because Windsor loves creating "Conspiracy theories" he really believes he can simply say this and that's just it.

    Listen you fat farce, watching your train wreck over the past few years has been at your own calling. You invited people to come and join in, help you promote yourself. There was no "Disclaimer" in your calls to Millions that only people who supported you were allowed to join in or watch your Sov Cit games.

    Oh, no, no, no--it doesn't work like that. Had you not attempted to amass a group large enough to "Take your country back" by any and ever means possible, including LYING OUT YOUR ASS, I wouldn't be watching, and cheering, when you get your ass handed to you by multiple courts across the U.S.

    No, there is no fricken way in hell, you can ever prove that position. Not one. While you may think you can spin your conspiracy crap with the lemmings, there is a far different reality. You're not special, and no one would take the time, nor need to, to "Set you up." No, that's you. You love and live for setting people up for the sole purpose of getting a woody over entering a courthouse.

    Judge Thrash was far too lenient towards you. Every single court you play your endless games in eventually understands just how "Corrupt" you are. That it is YOU who has the "Stated Goal" by amassing a group of Anti Court people to "Set them up" by bogging them down. Using and playing victim by "Setting up" the "Haters" as your avenue in the door? That game is about over.

    YOU are the one who "Orchestrated this" because you, as leader had a stated goal with your followers. That is the easy part now to prove.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was checking PACER for new filings. None found. I had seen this before but had forgotten the volume of cases Windsor filed in 2011. In general search of the courts by name, William M Windsor owns pages 2 and 3 of results, page 2 from #73 to #108, then all of page 3, #109 to #149

      Delete
    2. Frank Lee BillsadickNovember 1, 2015 at 11:10 AM

      Nah, he's not vexatious. He hasn't cost taxpayers outrageous amounts of money. He isn't ,by all aspect of the FBI Paper terrorist definition, the poster child of it. He isn't an abusive, tyrannical, menace to society as a whole, because he believes he has a Constitutional Right to launch frivolous lawsuits whenever, and wherever he wants.

      Thus, the motto of Vexi Land, the Sov Cit capital of Fuck-em-all-because-I-said-so, therefore I shall sue as my Constitutional Right to get down and get Vexi and there aint no law I will abide by, whereas you can stop me, because I shall summon fellow Vexi's and file, appeal, file, appeal, sometimes appealing before filing--until you surrender. It is the Sov Cit Vexi way.

      Delete
    3. The appeal before filing is a classic Windsor is a Doofus © SovCitz move. Even the other SovCitz giggle at that maneuver. js

      ℗ ♛ ❥

      Delete
    4. Roy Pilkey - " He is coming through Needles, this is a big guy, a really big guy, this is my Brother in arms. Bridget Langston Need to get with GL for this also."

      Delete
  20. Irrespective of Anon@7:07's trollish post, I am not at all prepared to call the Missoula case "done" because we haven't heard from the DA (Clark) yet. There's always been a wrinkle at the end of each act, and I have no doubt we'll see another unexpected turn very soon as well. In any case, no worries.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. OOOH, Plot twist? I love a good plot twist.
      Bring it MT!

      Delete
    2. If that ankle was unmonitored, he'd have told us by now. Can we presume that Windsor could survive even six months in jail? I'm not so sure. And despite all he says, time is not on his side and never will be again. He gambled his life on the wrong people, and that wrinkle has not fully set in yet.

      Delete
  21. Bill's just trying to frighten us now. Your criminal trial has nothing to do with us, Bill. We would have found it marginally more entertaining if the felonies hadn't been dropped, but that's it. Doesn't make anything you dream up against us more plausible. Trying to get us arrested as criminals now? Do your worst. Judge Haynes' decision doesn't mean anyone is more likely to take you seriously. Did you read it? How much respect did he show you? None. He made fun of you as much as a Judge dares in an opinion. You're a bag of gas. More people than ever before know that now. You're not frightening. We're not frightened.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He's in denial. He's out of excuses and his legal eagle wasn't so legally minded after all. He needs to change the subject because this depresses him. Last time he tried to have us arrested he went from police station to police station. I dare him to try that now.

      Delete
    2. "Your criminal trial has nothing to do with us, Bill. We would have found it marginally more entertaining if the felonies hadn't been dropped, but that's it."

      Exactly. Windsor's newest post is all about how butthurt "Joeys" are over Judge Haynes decision. Who is he talking about? Based on comments made in various places, I have the impression there is not much participation on JIALK. Windsor's number of defendants is down by 300. The only person with a vested interest and reason for butthurt is Boushie.

      Delete
    3. Right Ida, and I'm doubting that Boushie is that 'butthurt'. Boushie is still employed by UofMT, he has no criminal arrest history...
      Windsor, however, is still facing a criminal trial, but he's probably anxiously anticipating Clark's next move and when that will happen. There's a real #MotionWatch.

      Delete
    4. You have a good point. Boushie won. Regardless of the final outcome, Windsor has been held accountable and the physical stalking appears to have stopped.

      Delete
    5. And all Windsor's talk about butthurt screams projection to me.

      "Psychological projection, also known as blame shifting, is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against unpleasant impulses by denying their existence in themselves, while attributing them to others."

      "Projection tends to come to the fore in normal people at times of crisis, personal or political[17] but is more commonly found in the neurotic or psychotic[18] in personalities functioning at a primitive level as in narcissistic personality disorder or borderline personality disorder."

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

      Delete
    6. Yup, Boushie, the various courts in the state of Montana, and DA Clark have thwarted Windsor more than the #Thrashing he took in Georgia.
      I don't get the impression any of them are butthurt. ROTFL? Probably.

      Delete
  22. Windsor, if you really believe everything you did in Montana was legal and proper, then prove it. Go back there, put on your bp vest and try hanging out at the University of Montana. Go root out corruption, chicken shit. See what happens.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kinda puts things into perspective, doesn't it? He's been hollering at the moon for years now that he has mountains of evidence, but when given a court date to prove his innocence he does everything in his power to stall and delay. Failing in that task, he runs.

      Delete
  23. "On Friday, October 30, 3015, Bill Windsor has sought leave of a federal court to file a $100,000,000 damages lawsuit against 700 Joeys."

    Yeah, but which court and did he pay the filing fee?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 700? That's it? Just 700?
      Slacking off.

      Delete
    2. Yeah, what happened to the other 300? I checked PACER again this morning, still nothing new showing up. I looked at the docket history for N TX, the last thing showing up is Windsor's motion to withdraw the request for leave because his appeals are pending in TX10th COA.

      Delete
    3. Not Friends Of Bill WindsorNovember 2, 2015 at 8:46 AM

      And how is this alleged new federal suit any different than the others? It's the same amount of money he's been trying to get, the only difference is the number of defendants. Pretty sure the Federal Court in South Dakota he tried this in most recently told him to take a flying leap with his frivolous suit.

      Oh, and yeah, about that filing fee? Will he stall and play games paying it, like he's done in every court so far? Courts should have a "No pay, no play" rule for Windsor. '

      At some point in the near future, he is deserving of another Vexatious title, that includes a new Injunction fee for filing anything against anyone since all his cases get denied and or dismissed at some point because as soon as he is required to start proving his case, he can't.

      Delete
    4. I call BillSchit.
      $100,000,000? (Ceiling caps on damages is far less) Federal? Where?
      All Federal Courts checked. Nada.
      Windsor can go back to soothing his butthurt(s) and eyes peeled for Clark's Motion Watch.

      Delete
    5. Robert Cookout IIINovember 2, 2015 at 9:41 AM

      His comment says he sought leave to file. His "if you don't say no in two weeks that means yes" letter to a judge won't show up on pacer.

      Delete
    6. LOL I think you nailed that one Mr. Cookout. We've all seem him play that game several times before too.

      Delete
    7. Ha! Thank you RC3! Those pesky nuances, got me again, my bad.

      Delete
  24. Not Friends Of Bill WindsorNovember 2, 2015 at 9:21 AM

    Federal Billshit cases just in the past two years showing up:

    1) Filed: August 20, 2015 as 9:2015cv00107
    Plaintiff: William M. Windsor
    Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

    2) Filed: July 1, 2015 as 4:2015mc00098
    Plaintiff: William M. Windsor
    Defendant: Ginger Snap, Yappy, Ollie Reader and others
    Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

    3) Filed: July 1, 2015 as 4:2015cv04118
    Plaintiff: William M. Windsor
    Defendant: Ginger Snap, Yappy, Ollie Reader and others
    Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

    4) Filed: March 17, 2015 as 15-1565
    Plaintiff - Appellant: William M. Windsor
    Defendant - Appellee: Joey is a Little Kid

    5) Filed: December 24, 2014 as 3:2014cv03020
    Plaintiff: William M. Windsor
    Defendant: Joey is a Little Kid

    6) In re: Administrative Matter re William M. Windsor
    Filed: September 2, 2014 as 4:2014mc80248
    Plaintiff: William M. Windsor

    7) William Windsor v. Sean Boushie, et al
    Filed: July 23, 2014 as 14-35623
    Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
    Defendant - Appellee: SEAN M. BOUSHIE, UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA

    8) In re: William Windsor
    Filed: April 24, 2014 as 14-10498
    Petitioner: In re: WILLIAM M. WINDSOR

    9) In Re: Administrative Matter Involving William M Windsor
    Filed: March 18, 2014 as 3:2014mc00045
    Objector: Sean Fleming

    10) Windsor v. Boushie
    Filed: December 26, 2013 as 9:2013cv00311
    Plaintiff: William M. Windsor
    Defendant: Sean M. Boushie, University of Montana
    Cause Of Action: Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander

    11) Windsor v. Overstreet
    Filed: August 1, 2013 as 4:2013cv00778
    Defendant: Allie Loraine Yager Overstreet , John Does 1-1000
    Plaintiff: William M. Windsor
    Cause Of Action: Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander

    12) Filed: March 26, 2013 as 4:2013mc09008
    Plaintiff: William M Wndsor
    Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not Friends Of Bill WindsorNovember 2, 2015 at 9:34 AM

      And who's "Butthurt?" Who is "Orchestrating" this crap? Who's a Vexatious POS harassing people through courts? That isn't even the list of the civil crap!!
      HAHAHAHAH Oh man, what a moron! Toot toot!! Keep blowing your own horn Windsor...lord knows you've got tons of hot air!

      Delete
  25. Tired of scrolling?
    Turn the page>>>>>

    ℗ ♛ ❥

    ReplyDelete