Search This Blog

Monday, September 14, 2015

Windsor Wraps Up His Week w/a Video Rant

Windsor's latest uploaded video?  A difficult to watch, much less to follow rant, in my opinion. 
Windsor's deteriorating physical appearance was nothing short of shocking (to me) in comparison to photos of him just 6 months ago. 
The main thing I noticed?  Windsor's inability to even look directly at his own camera as he launches off into his spun version of his weary tale of woe. 
I have a difficult time believing anyone that cannot or will not look directly at whoever they're speaking to, or that they must look to the right or look down when speaking.  
If what is being said is the truth?  Events really happened?  There's no stuttering, stammering, no interjecting of side stories & jokes.  The words flow and the gaze never waivers. 
These images are what I noticed most while attempting to view Windsor's latest spew.  He continuously looked to the right & glanced down, and this was repeated throughout his entire diatribe. 
The few times he looks directly into the camera?  Windsor was attempting to be humorous or sarcastic. 
Desperate and pitiful are the most appropriate adjectives that I can use to describe his performance. 
Once again, I call flat out BillSchit. 
Windsor did far better behind the camera and I still believe he should've just finished his documentary/movie as he promised so many people that he would. 








189 comments:

  1. "I will be doing some filming including filming of government employees at work using one or more of my hidden cameras. This is perfectly legal, and they always enjoy it so much when they see what they did. "

    www.mtd.uscourts.gov/pdf/rulesorders/SO%20DLC-24.pdf

    Oh, I so hope he does some filming!!! Just check out the above. The Federal courthouse security has been alerted to his possible presence, including his illegal spy cameras. Montana is a 2 party state btw, record anyone but a public official doing their job, as in police, and it is another misdemeanor, AKA Privacy in communications.

    ReplyDelete
  2. He looks like hell.

    Should probably dry out before court...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There's the real reason his hands shake. Dizzy crap, too.

      See "Delirium Tremens"...

      Delete
    2. Ahhh. Yes, that seems appropriate in conjunction with his disturbing video. Did you also catch the part where it appears he put his shaky hand on the computer, and the screen was bouncing? Yeah, something is really, really amiss and perhaps while he's driving around aimlessly through MT, with hopes of doing more harassing and filming, LE can step in and do a little "test." He shouldn't be driving anywhere, at any time, under any circumstances based on that video.

      Delete
    3. I nailed it. Billy's a drunk. Might be why Bab's dumped him, too.

      Healthiest he's looked in years was after being released from lockup.

      Delete
    4. Spam, you may be right on. That red tint on his bulbous nose could be from heavy drinking (that habit is known to eventually burst capillaries in the nose - think W.C. Fields effect). Same thing with his red face.

      Delete
    5. Haha! I love that we can get into his head even when we are not talking about him. I've been trying to tempt him to do this for awhile and finally he took the bait. I've wondered where his movie camera was and whether he was not filming himself so we couldn't make truthful observations about his health and mind. This was shot on a desk/computer camera. Where is the big movie camera, Bill? You of all people would be unable to complete a for theatre movie on a computer cam. But thank you for filming yourself again. I'm sure the appropriate parties will have a gander.

      Delete
    6. He's reciting in the video. He's convinced himself of the truth of these stories, written them down where he can read them over and over again. He wrote a note claiming he had evidence so he's convinced himself that his version of events is really true. Take away his notes and his friends and all he has is whatever he's recited. There are no facts, no evidence, and no elaborations. Just the same old rant practiced so much that he could say it without thinking and try to interject his charisma, except he doesn't have charisma anymore.
      This video doesn't prove the existence of spy cameras or that he even still has his movie camera. He will probably do a repeat of the gun episode by first claiming he has them, then denying it, then suing anyone who mentions them, then claiming he has them.

      Delete
  3. Frank Lee BillsadickSeptember 14, 2015 at 10:21 AM

    Here's a question. Windsor claims the 'movie' was stopped. Well, the farce that is Windsor was capable of making another all about me movie, where the hell is the all about them movie? WHO exactly "Stopped" it? HOW did "they" stop it? Is he still able to film? Yes. Was it his own doing to "Stop?" Yes. Did and does he have the financial means to finish? Yes. Does it take hundreds of thousands of dollars to make a "Documentary?" NO. These are all excuses, of which he is seeking multi millions of dollars for--when HE is the real reason there in no movie. No TV show. Nothing.

    HE is a failure, and a liar, and a fraudster documented yet once again in last nights all about Bill show. Such a crock of crap! This douche should be charged by the Feds.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have never understood the who, what or how that movie was stopped either.
      Windsor didn't stop driving from state to state or stop using his Facebook or .coms, Windsor continued zipping around staking people he thought disagreed with him and attempted to harass them online. Windsor just stopped doing the movie because he started his stalking your and ProSeBabying himself into civil oblivion.

      That's worked out well for Windsor so far, he should just keep it up. Face palm. Seriously, his cheddar has slid off his Fudrucker's fries.

      That video of him? Whoa! Damn! Windsor looked much healthier and stronger when he was incarcerated in Ellis County. His 'freedom' the past few months apparently hasn't done him any physical favors. He looks rough, prolly shoulda made time to see those doctors he was gonna.

      Delete
    2. His constant claims he has evidence are so old. Has he ever presented a single piece of evidence he claims to have. His idiotic "because I swore in front of a notory, it has to be true" affidavits aren't evidence. He's never even posted the email he claims Boushie sent after the "assassination attempt".

      Delete
  4. Great observation, Frank. No one stopped that movie except Windsor. One wonders why the lemmings cannot ask Bill, who stopped the movie? How did they do that, Bill? Be specific, Bill. Don't they wonder?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Frank Lee BillsadickSeptember 14, 2015 at 11:32 AM

      They've obviously been trained not to ask questions.

      My complaint is that all his civil suits and subsequent harassment through the courts was for this alleged damage. His complaint with MT is for this "damage" and "denial of his rights" which to my knowledge Larson explained in depth to him, was stalking, and not a right. He's committed fraud repeatedly. Every time he utters that excuse, it's more fraud. He has cost tax payers in the US who knows how much money on this fraud.

      At what point did or could Windsor ever claim and prove anyone actually stopped his ability to finish that stupid movie? At what point does someone in the Government step in, and slap that motherfucker? Make him repay each and every state for their wasted time AND protect the taxpayers from further damages for this fraud?

      Windsor loves to stand on the first amendment but that amendment does not afford him the rights he claims it does. It does not grant him the right to purchase domains for the sole purpose of harassment and retaliation, with dissemination of completely false and malicious rants. It does not grant him the right to film, and post his stalking, harassing, and retaliatory rants. It does not grant him the right to turn around and SUE people who are expressing their first amendment rights to disagree with him. On and on and on...

      This entire debacle is past the ridiculous phase.

      Delete
    2. I agree with all you stated, @Frank!

      Delete
    3. Amen, FLB.

      Ms. Clark did not lie to Windsor in advising him he may have violated federal law.

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2261A

      Delete
    4. FLB,
      Whoop, whoop, whoop! Hallelujah! Amen!

      Delete
  5. Please excuse my language. I normally don't use words like this here, but when I was in Fort Worth, we had a name for Bill's condition. Bugfuck. Short for bugfucking crazy. It's what came immediately to mind while watching that clip. He is. Has a slim chance to get off scott free and can't stand it. Has to insult Montana and the University of Montana some more, as well as the Judge who will be reviewing that crucial brief, perhaps today. Some kind of weird power trip.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Bill claims to have thousands of followers. Over 35,000 on his Lawless America Facebook page. Yet his first video in over a year has 107 views. I'd also bet 2/3 of those views are by his "haters". Where are his legions of supporters?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That video is nothing more than the ranting of a delusional, spoiled child. We are all sitting front row watching Bill slip further into the depths of insanity. How could anyone think there will be any media coverage of the man in that video? Watching that the first thought that comes to mind is a homeless guy outside a downtown bus stop holding a sign that says the end of the world is here.

      Delete
    2. Where are his legions of supporters?

      Bangladesh.

      Delete
    3. I ❥ those Bangladeshi!

      ℗ ♛ ❥

      Delete
  7. Windsors newest video is even a flop lmao!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is he crying (again) ?
      His eyes are really watery & red, and I thought I heard a sniffle or two. So it's either tears or maybe they're just watery red eyes from way too much pot or booze or both lol

      Delete
  8. Not Friends Of Bill WindsorSeptember 14, 2015 at 5:32 PM

    I wonder if he's planning on paying the 50K bond & permission for leave, with these filings against the government people. I believe the Thrash order stated just that...and by the sound of "Civil rights Lawsuit," that doesn't seem like an appeal. Sounds like an outright new suit. Anyone? Thoughts?

    "BILL WINDSOR IS TYPING AS FAST AS HE CAN IN HELENA MONTANA

    I am trying to finish several court filings. Most important is my 42 U.S.C. 1983 Civil Rights Lawsuit against the government workers in Montana. I will be filing this in person at the United States District Court in Helena Montana. I am asking the federal court to issue an injunction to stop the Montana criminal case against me because the charges are all Constitutional rights."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yup. That's a #Thrasher by the sounds of it.

      Delete
    2. He gave up on getting leave in Texas. Interesting enough I think that he did not like the probability that he would be turned down again setting precedence for his filings in upcoming cases in Helena. I wonder if Jennifer Clark has a copy of Thrashes order so she can shoot him down right away.

      Delete
    3. Constitutional Rights? Damn he's a brick head. Windsor? Please re read, if you can, and try really hard to comprehend what Judge Larson said. You were stalking. You have NO Constitutional rights to stalk, nor does anyone else. You're NOT MEDIA and MEDIA can't do what you did and get away with it either. STALKING!! CLEAR STALKING!! You violated the L.A.W. You received a temporary order of protection against you based on your own actions--documented--filmed--written down, and applauded by your lawless friends.

      You being the premature filer that you are, basically accepted it, by appealing it. You don't appeal something until an order is issued, (oops, did that in TX too didn't you) but you're a brick head, and figure appealing stops things. It doesn't. You screwed yourself. Had you just gone to the hearing, you could have blathered on and on, THEN appealed, and THEN showed the appellate court the shit you kept trying to show them--which they had to keep telling you was NOT the proper venue for an APPEAL!! Double facepalm. LOOK--point is, you know damn well the games you're playing. Your only profession for what? The past 10 years? Is being a Vexatious prick.

      Perhaps this little extra time before the actual trial, is to get ALL the shit together to show the games YOU played, that you continually deny you do, and brush off as "Corruption." Think about that if you can brick head. Mocking the courts doesn't sit well with people like juries, who are the people paying for your games...you know...hard working taxpaying citizens. (Have you paid your taxes yet BTW? What about Barbara. Those divorce papers said you hadn't for a few years...)

      (Oh yeah, and put the bottle down. Your nose size had almost doubled in two years, and the red thing you're sporting on the end? It ain't Christmas, and you're too fat to play Rudolph. glug, glug, glug)

      Delete
  9. Frank Lee BillsadickSeptember 14, 2015 at 5:40 PM

    "Great news is that KD only has the Glossary to go! The book will soon be ready for the printer."

    I call Billshit again!! Just the other day, he was yacking to people that they could put a chapter or so in the book. If this KD is basically done? Why did he offer to let them put something in? Just another Windsor Whopper to brownnose the lemmings into believing he had any interest or intent to do anything he blusters about. LIAR!! FRAUD!! CON!! ASSHOLE!!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Book #1.
    Book #2.
    TalkShoes galore.
    TV show.
    100's of defamation websites.
    Round America revamp.
    Lawsuit, lawsuit, lawsuit.
    Etc., etc., etc.


    ABFTFM.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep - ABFTFM because as long as it's all in his head, it's perfect. No one can criticize it; no one can sue him for not vetting stories and verifying information. Since he can't face any of those things, there will never be an L.A. movie/documentary/TV show/book/etc./etc./etc.

      I just feel for those remaining "followers" that are so desperate, they're willing to allow themselves to be strung along (although he's promised a finished film since 2013 or so). Must be a pathetic life, when you're that desperate and empty-handed.

      Delete
  11. The good news is, Windsor's told the same old tired story so much that even he's tired of it. He's whittled it down to less than 26 minutes. It used to take him 2 hours to get the whole thing out.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Rhynophyma or Bulbous nose (enlarged vessels and skin overgrowth) could be due to rosasea but if so, it should develop gradually over a period of years. To slow progression he should avoid: drinking, smoking, corticosteroids (causes euphoria, interferes with sleep, may cause fluid retention), and medications that dilate blood vessels (think purple pills). Whatever he's on and whatever else is going on, his autopsy will likely show systemic and widespread organ damage.

    ReplyDelete
  13. "IS JENNIFER CLARK OF THE MISSOULA COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE PREPARING TO WAVE THE WHITE FLAG OF SURRENDER?"

    * Yeah, you go with that, Billy .. Lol. *

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Uh...no Billy, that white flag is your soiled panties from last Friday's pretrial hearing. You know, the one were you lied about its proceedings?

      BTW, the TOP WAS in force; and Clark already has her brief in on that fact.

      Delete
    2. Apparently you believe what you want to believe, ie, that Windsor portrayed the events of the hearing truthfully and faithfully. Even you know he's a liar, don't you Snooze?

      Delete
    3. Snooze, maybe if you actually had a law degree or were as well versed in law as you pretend to be, the TOP would not have been so difficult for you to understand and follow.
      Thankfully Ms.Clark is everything you pretend to be and has a complete & clear understanding of the TOP and I'm pretty sure the judge does as well. But you know what? You just keep on keeping on pretending to be a attorney and giving Willy legal advice. Lol !

      Delete
    4. Billy should learn to actually pay attention to what other people say. The Judge clearly stated that the deadline for Sept 14th was waived and re-set for a date two weeks from that day. William Windsor is once again a BIG FAT LIAR!!!

      Delete
    5. Frank Lee BillsadickSeptember 15, 2015 at 9:00 AM

      Shhhhh. That is not how "we" are remembering it.
      In Windsor World? Do not ask questions. Do not point out the obvious. Just go with it, otherwise you get sued. Have you not learned anything yet? Oh wait, you're already being sued (Anonymous)...in SD...(allegedly) so carry on!

      Delete
    6. Dont forget Sd, Texas, Kansas, California, Missouri, Montana, and 2 Federal courts....

      Delete
    7. Frank Lee BillsadickSeptember 15, 2015 at 10:26 AM

      LOL sorry, you're correct.
      They are all just copy/paste/re-run suits anyway.
      Strictly designed to just be an annoyance, and not for merit or to win (per Snooze)

      Funny how when things get heated for Windsor though, and he is being asked to "own his shit" he runs (or waddles) like the wind (or stale fart).

      I say, when he backs out of a suit--he should be sanctioned though. Clearly he never could "own his shit" and should not be allowed to just waddle away. Perhaps that might curb his enthusiasm for filing repetitive, frivolous, and malicious harassment suits. Cha Ching!!
      (Only thing he loves more than being a vindictive vexatious asshole? Is his precious money....that gives his the freedom to BE a vindictive vexatious asshole)

      Delete
    8. I was re-reading one of Sharon's public filings last night. She may have given Windsor extensive material in that she claims she was denied access to courts as a pro-se litigant. Early on she claimed Bill was a danger to her and other pro-se because of his abuse of the courts. Just go to show that she doesn't care about anyone but herself, because if she did, she would not be helping him abuse the courts now.
      And Bill? In Nascar the white flag is waved at the race leader and signifies that there is 1 lap left to go.

      Delete
  14. I don't know if the DA is really planning on waiving the white flag, but something Montana needs to recognize is that other states have suffered the wrath of Windsor due to their warrant. Idaho and Texas will not give one rats ass if another fugitive from Montana shows up in their states IF they let Windsor go.

    It will make Montana look very weak in enforcement of warrants, not to mention the wasted money on housing him in their jails FOR Montana.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Schnoozorz, even Windsor correctly guessed why the Judge asked for that brief from the prosecution. It's so he can establish fact, pre-trial. That arrow will be fully removed from Windsor's courtroom quiver. He pulls it out, he gets shut down. He can't even mention it to the jury.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fantastic metaphor. Well done!

      Delete
  16. Once the Judge sides with the brief, Windsor could possibly bring in a witness certified "expert" by the court in order to get around that ruling on the facts, but that's for an appeal - not Windsor's initial STALKING trial. Smart move by the Judge. I can see why he thinks the trial can't continue without his ruling on the prosecution's brief, as well as Windsor's rebuttal. It's the meat in the felony hamburger.

    ReplyDelete
  17. How pathetic. Kinda sad, were it anyone else...

    "Bill Windsor
    5 hrs · Edited ·
    JUST 95 LIKES TO GO TO HIT A RECORD OF 1,000. PLEASE CLICK ON LINK TO GO TO LAWLESSAMERICA.COM AND CLICK "LIKE" ON THIS ARTICLE. THANK YOU. I REALLY LIKE ROUND NUMBERS. DON'T YOU? "

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL!! Here's a round number for him. "0"
      That's how many movies he's produced, books he written, awards he's won for his "efforts," and how much credibility he has in anything he says. "0".
      It's also the shape of his body, and that ginormous head. It's the number of jurors who will side with him. It's the shape his mouth will get used to very shortly, when his fictitious little world of lies comes crashing down and meets reality, and there isn't a facebook with lemmings to click "like" or comment on his lies.

      "0"=Windsor's life in general.

      Delete
    2. Brilliant and hysterical (as usual), Ninja.

      Delete
    3. Make a lonely old man happy and click "like", damnit!

      Delete
    4. YAH, Ninja!!!!! :)
      "0" = Number of court cases that Windsor has ever won.

      Delete
  18. Does anybody remember why there was not a hearing on the TOP? I recall that one was scheduled, then canceled. Am I remembering correctly?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There was a hearing set for 9/9/2013. Windsor motioned to vacate the TOP, he asked for all that discovery and a new judge.

      https://supremecourtdocket.mt.gov/view/DA%2013-0785%20Published%20--%20Opinion?id={5C73321C-7B13-4A6E-BAA3-BA67FDF2C199}

      Delete
    2. Gotta be rare for anyone to go to a court and say, please don't protect this person from me - please let me bother this person, stalk them and make them fear me.

      Delete
    3. That would be a weird request, huh? Would it go something like:
      "I don't wanna quit stalking & harassing them and their spouse! It's my right to photograph them, camp out at their place of employment, make hate sites using their names and all the things I find great joy doing! You cannot stop me from stalking this person! It's unconstitutional! I'm gonna sue! I'm gonna sue!"

      Delete
    4. It is not rare for people to appeal a TOP.

      Delete
    5. It's not rare for people to appeal parking tickets. Thanks so much for pointing out the obvious, Snoozan. Fascinating info--it demonstrates your moniker is well and truly deserved..zzzzzzz.

      Delete
    6. Might not be rare where the protection order stops someone from seeing their kids or visiting their own property. It IS rare in situations like Windsor's, and if you're going to say it isn't, moron, list examples besides Windsor. I could understand Bill objecting to being denied a protection order. I can't understand, and Judges in Montana can't understand, Bill objecting to SB being protected. Just walk away, man. It's not your city or your state. It's not your family. Obeying that TOP, for Windsor, should be the easiest thing in the World. Just leave someone alone! You don't have to DO anything! Just stop doing some stuff! Oh I know, Snooze, every Judge that has ever dealt with Windsor is wrong on the law, whereas your egotistical, puffy-faced hero is right.

      Delete
    7. It's rare for someone to challenge a TOP with the volumes of paper and in as many courts as Windsor did, then blame someone else when there wasn't a hearing. If he had STFU and not prevented the hearing, the stupid TOP might have expired without an order for extension. Windsor's continued to pounding on Boushie, U of M and the courts gave the courts cause to extend the TOP. Around and around we go...

      Delete
    8. Yep @ Ida, I agree 100%.
      That right there IS the truth of the entire situation.
      Windsor's inability to STFU, and his obsession with frivolous filings. If Snooze can't see the fact that Windsor screwed himself, when he filed the appeal prior to attending the hearing? Then she is even more of an idiot than she's shown herself to be here. SMDH.

      I agree with others--what Windsor has done is Fraud upon the courts. All the appeals? Fraud. Everything he is and has been doing, was due to his own actions--and not "Court Corruption."

      Delete
  19. Is the Lawless TV show cancelled? What happened to that? As I channel surf...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He must be too busy watching that 'like' counter...

      Delete
    2. He should fire his publicist. I can't find it listed in the tv listing or even what channel its on. When do the promotional commercials air again?

      Delete
  20. If Bill ever released a book or a movie, he might find himself being sued by the person he stole the idea from:

    http://www.amazon.com/Lawless-World-Making-Breaking-Global/dp/0141017996

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep, Bill stole the name and idea for his biggest con from a Cambridge graduate who became a professor and lawyer of international law.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jC_aGLd9iYE

      Delete
    2. Interesting. Do you think Windsor actually sat down and read a scholarly book? I'm having a hard time trying to imagine that. On the other hand, he may have listened to an audio book.

      Delete
    3. Bill Windsor has a history of copyright fraud. He was losing the MOM case and suing the US government. He was looking for anyone who could make his case for him that the US Government is corrupt. He admittedly hooked up with others like him online and he has been insistent that he has been using the LA name since 2006/2007 when the first use the public saw was many years later. So not only did he see an idea that fit his needs and take it as he had so many times, but by insisting that he had been using the name for so long (we always wondered why) he was trying to insulate himself from a lawsuit. Of course he would not have really read it, rather than heard about it or thumbed through it, or just saw the guys in the news.

      Delete
    4. Most tellingly, Bill could never explain the term Lawless America. How did he go from the regrettable acronyms SOCK and GRIP that would never work for a national campaign to a fully flushed out name like LA? People began to ask why he was using that name because it sounded like he was promoting for a lawless country. So he asked his followers to send in videos explaining the term.

      Delete
    5. Not Friends Of Bill WindsorSeptember 17, 2015 at 9:04 AM

      Because Windsor has no original ideas, he's stupid and his sense of humor lacks a great deal of humor.

      Looking at this name "Lawless America" and Windsor is leading the group "Lawless America" that has always indicated or sounded like they ARE Lawless. Windsor's actions are Lawless. He does not follow the laws one single bit, so keeping with his actions and the name he was leader for it makes perfect sense to anyone with a brain, that Windsor's Lawless America is what he wants to create, with the "Majority party" a new political platform.

      Not his lame excuse because we live in a "Lawless America" because that would have a term AGAINST it--NOT FOR IT.

      Seriously, the guy is a fricken joke. The Haters were right to stand up against his "Lawless America" idea, name, agenda. Windsor is just a big, fat, pie loving, Narcissist, who hates rules, therefore wants to lead "Lawless (no current rules/law--only those Windsor makes up) America (Windsor World)

      Delete
  21. Move over Snoozer--GinA is takin' over!
    Windsor now has another avenue to get a new kind of Vexi!
    Buckle up Montana--GinA has a new plan to help Windsor!
    Sorry Snooze--game over for you! Awwww

    GinA-- it appears you can remove your case to federal court for civil rights issues under 28 USC 1443!!

    "Any of the following civil actions or criminal prosecutions, commenced in a State court may be removed by the defendant to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place wherein it is pending:
    (1) Against any person who is denied or cannot enforce in the courts of such State a right under any law providing for the equal civil rights of citizens of the United States, or of all persons within the jurisdiction thereof;
    (2) For any act under color of authority derived from any law providing for equal rights, or for refusing to do any act on the ground that it would be inconsistent with such law."

    Bill Windsor-- Well I'll be a blue nose gopher. Thanks GinA; I'll consider this ASAP. - (Actually Bill, you're a red nosed blowhard)

    GinA-- Bill, i have skype and a high speed internet connection and i would be honored to help you in any way i can ... i'm also a computer techie and a legal secretary by career ... so you'll get the best of both worlds with me

    Bill Windsor-- Thanks so much, GinA !!!!! I'll graciously accept your help. Let me get back with you after I get out of Montana, which will be late Thursday.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You sure that's not Sharon/Susan?

      Delete
    2. GinA is too nice. Snooze is a memory.
      Wave bye, Snooze, Windsor's got a new legal eagle!

      Delete
    3. Why is it that Marty hasn't engaged his vast array of media contacts?

      Where's USA Today? 20/20? Dateline?

      Even Ellen?

      Delete
    4. "Bill Windsor
      I sent out news releases, and no one responded. Sadly typical. I think it should be big news.
      2 · More · 4 hours ago"

      Delete
    5. Marty Prehn: I demand that you get on SCS Public Access and get Bill Windsor the coverage he deserves.

      Delete
    6. Seriously,Spam ?
      Don't you know Marty is way too busy running “ Half- Pint:” Melissa Gilbert's run for Michigan congress, to contact his media contacts for Billy. Lol

      Delete
    7. I would think there would be a time limit to federal removal, but I may be wrong.

      Delete
    8. Rut roh, Susan is shooting down GinA's legal advice. Could be trouble brewing in the land of the lemmings.

      Delete
    9. "Flying monkeys away!"

      Delete
    10. I'd bet on GinA. At least she will post a link to the stuff she's referring to. Susan has never backed up anything she claims.

      Delete
    11. You mean like when you insisted calling someone a terrorist was prima facie defamation?

      Delete
    12. Windsor is the definition of domestic terrorist.
      #OwnThatShit
      GinA took Snoozie's favored head pat spot :-)

      Delete
    13. I really appreciate the staff here at Petunia's; they really know how to keep the area sanitary and are quick with the "courtesy flush."

      ♥♥♥♥♥

      Delete
    14. Oh, I'd argue the Soonze really owns her sh*t...packed tightly between her ears.

      Delete
    15. My 'crew' is the best of the best!
      I'm a lucky Paca ♛

      ❥ ❥ ❥ ❥ ❥

      Delete
  22. Windsor: "I have spent the last two days drafting a Civil Rights Complaint to be filed in federal court. It seeks an injunction to stop the criminal prosecution of me because the alleged crimes aren't crimes. They are fundamental Constitutional rights -- the freedom to publish the name of a man who attempted to murder me..."

    Your claim that SB attempted to murder you is at once ridiculous and probably a fabrication. It's a lie, Bill. It's not maybe a lie - it's definitely a lie and looks to have been equipped with evidence illegally fabricated by you or you and Crystal Cox. The constitution doesn't protect your right to lie, Bill Windsor, and in fact provides punishment for you and financial relief for those you've lied about.

    If SB can prove he couldn't have shot at you (I strongly suspect he can) and DID NOT send that email (again, I think he can prove this) then never mind your criminal liability or that of Ms Cox, SB stands to collect a large portion of your assets. You're a moron, Bill Windsor. See, that's not defamation because I believe it to be true and you cannot prove me wrong. You don't really believe SB tried to murder you. If someone can prove you're lying about that belief, as would happen if a co-conspirator testified about a conversation or a conspiracy, then that is absolutely defamation. Textbook.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Windsor makes a lot of statements in his latest LA post that are aggravating. But this statement ticked me off a lot some reason: "Based upon my research, there has never been anyone criminally prosecuted in America for publishing a person’s name or for sending an email to an attorney. I am the first."

      Ah, no. I recall several of the AMPP members were jailed for refusing to remove websites that named their ex's and/or children. But, the only AMPP name I can remember is Claudine Dombroski.

      http://batteredmotherscustody.blogspot.com/2009/11/claudine-dombrowski-shawnee-county-case.html

      Then there's this guy. It's a 2-fer, he had a protective order against him and his claim to be "media" was shot down too: "Mr. Trummel countered these charges in court by stating that his activities were privileged against such prosecution because he had a press card and was conducting an investigation of his fellow residents, as well as the staff and board of directors of the Council House apartment building. The court held that, though freelance journalists are protected by the First Amendment, Mr. Trummel’s claim to be a bona fide member of the press was bogus, as he had never entered his supposed press credentials into evidence."

      http://www.mediainstitute.org/ONLINE/FAM2003/2-l.html

      And this guy:

      http://blogs.findlaw.com/eleventh_circuit/2013/11/muckraking-blogger-jailed-for-refusing-to-take-down-blog-posts.html

      This guy was criminally charged for posting pictures of a woman who had a PO. Turned out to be a false complaint (he didn't post the pics) but he was arrested and jailed before the charges were dismissed.

      http://www.nj.com/middlesex/index.ssf/2014/11/charlie_kratovil_restraining_order_charge.html

      I'm sure there are lots more, but I've run out of play time for now.

      Delete
    2. Totally agree, Ida - and when he lies and posts he is the first person ever to be charged with a felony for tweeting. Ummmm no, he is NOT the first as I commented the other day & put links to other "Felony Twitters" there are many, many that have been charged with a felony for tweeting.
      He just lies !!

      Delete
    3. Not quite the story regarding ampp being jailed for any of that. Again thank you for playing.

      Delete
    4. These are quotes from the link I posted, written by Claudine:

      "...but was found in contempt of Court for a tribute video for my dead mother and daughter. I was asked to remove the video to which I did on April 6th..."

      "...I spoke on a local television station with District Attorney Chad Taylor regarding Domestic Violence on the rise in Shawnee County. The next day, I was held in contempt of the court..."

      I distinctly remember a Lori somebody being jailed for something similar and discussion of others within the group that were either in jail at one point or threatened with jail for not removing names off websites. Some of Windsor's AMPP member videos being pulled off the web due to threats of contempt for publishing names.

      My point is that Windsor is not the first person to be threatened with or doing jail time for publishing a person's name and he is aware that people he supported faced the same issues.

      Delete
    5. The Lori somebody I was thinking of is Loryn Ryder. I got her confused with Lori Handrahan. Loryn was in jail, Lori was threatened with jail.

      https://twitter.com/amppusa/status/276294150113083393

      https://www.facebook.com/ChildrenLost/posts/398941993517749

      https://www.facebook.com/events/505039982893201/

      Delete
  23. "Bill Windsor
    It's time for another KPat Video !
    More · 18 minutes ago"


    Indeed!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh my Lord!!
      I hope there's no audio! Dogs across the nation will fall over if they hear that voice!
      ***faints***

      ℗ ♛ ❥

      Delete
  24. A Film Producer is going to File a Motion to Film in the Court Case? That kind of statement means that Bill is full of it and that he once again is making this all up. People do not make court motions to let filming go on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That "letter" he "received" was obviously written by none other than William Windsor himself. It's "outrageous"! But he knows it'll fool the lemmings. That's why he included the part about how they won't be able to get their story told.

      Delete
    2. No screenshot of *letter*.
      Why does this *letter* read as though Windsor himself wrote it?
      Sniff? Sniff?
      #BillSchit
      Bill Windsor
      3 hrs · Edited ·
      TV CREW IS SEEKING PERMISSION FROM JUDGE JAMES A. HAYNES TO FILM THE FELONY TWEETING TRIAL OF WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
      I was approached last week by a TV crew that wanted to know if I would support their efforts to film my trial. I told them I would be delighted.
      I understand the producer is preparing to file a motion seeking approval. Here is some of what was shared with me:
      "The Defendant, Mr. William Windsor, is documenting public corruption, and he has done an excellent job at it. For the last three years, he has documented and shown corruption at all levels of Government, and that apparently has made him a target by those in Government, particularly those who are engaged in mal acts.
      "I am concerned with what I am seeing in this case. Mr. Windsor is apparently being prosecuted for a tweet made on Twitter? My education in Law School seems to tell me that this is an issue that is clearly protected under the First Amendment. Why this is even being prosecuted is beyond me other than as retaliation.
      "Further, Mr. Windsor has demonstrated that there is a reasonable chance he was not the person who even sent the tweet (which again is protected under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution). So, it's questionable whether probable cause even exists. In fact, it's a likely violation of the First Amendment.
      "I have read some of the information that Mr. Windsor has provided on Sean Boushie. I am concerned about the actions of Mr. Boushie which include countless threats against Bill Windsor and his actions which amount to flagrant intimidation and retaliatory statements to Mr. Windsor. According to the facts stated by Mr. Windsor, it appears that on occasions Mr. Boushie has suggested that he was going to kill Mr. Windsor or has outright said he would.
      "It appears that several Montana Courts have overlooked these allegations and have not even held a hearing into the validity of the allegations that Mr. Windsor has raised. If all that I have read is true, it would appear that the Courts have no interest in curbing this behavior by Mr. Boushie. Again, at no point in time has the Court acknowledged this or taken judicial notice of the allegations by Mr. Windsor. This is outrageous.
      "So, it appears that Mr. Windsor is being prosecuted to assault Mr. Windsor and/or protect Mr. Boushie, and justice is not the end game. This is one of the pure instances in which a camera is certainly needed.
      "The Defendant in this case needs a fair trial, and it is well-established that videotaping a trial keeps people more honest.
      "This is a significant case. What seems to be at stake here is not only Mr. Windsor and his livelihood, but the many hundreds, if not thousands, of people he has videotaped over the years. If he loses his case, then their ability to have their stories told to a wider audience will likely be affected. This is a sad state of affairs that many tax-paying Americans have been harmed due to the actions of government actors, and it appears that someone wanting to fix this great injustice is going to be attacked to keep this from being made aware to more people."

      Delete
    3. "The Defendant, Mr. William Windsor, is documenting public corruption..."
      Now, the public is corrupt too?
      ROTFLMAO

      Delete
    4. The only thing that rings true to me about this "Letter," is that people (perhaps hundreds of thousands as Windsor claims) read his one sided internet defamatory content and then spread around those lies.

      Can this TV person back up any of those claims with evidence? Does this person have anything tangible, other than what "Windsor claims" took place? Have they read ALL the court documents, or just what Windsor put out, and refuted with his particularly dramatic Billshit spin?

      I see the same pre-emptive failure set up--that "They were denied" filming--so that must mean "Corruption." Not that they are even real, or that they even submitted anything to the court. Actually--had they read Larson's order, they wouldn't have made those claims at all, and would have merely asked to film the proceedings as it is of public interest. A man, violating a protective order, claiming he was media and that affords him "Rights" to stalk would be a much better angle for an impartial TV crew to approach, because THAT is the crux of the entire hearing. Not Windsor's tales of Woe.

      I assume if it's real, it would be one of the lemmings like Schied or that other one, (can't remember the name) who also run Anti government internet drivel and call it 'media'.
      (If it's real, hopefully the Judge researches their credentials. Windsor claimed he was media, and Whistleblower was the company, and never had to provide any proof or evidence to support the legality of those claims)

      Delete
    5. How nice! Eugene (Gene) Paulson is so pleased with Windsor TV news. I find the continued relationship interesting since Paulson was convicted and imprisoned for doing the harassing judge game via the Sov Cit crap Windsor was teaching...guess those diehard Anti Government assholes just don't learn.

      "Gene Paulson-- Great news. When they are done with your trial they need to look into my Appeal to the SCOTUS. You never get anywhere with these scoundrels till the last day when they finally accept the fact that you are never going to give up."

      Delete
    6. For a letter coming from a media professional, it sure has a lot of orphaned quote marks...

      Delete
    7. Why was this not sent from the tv station's legal department complete with their logo and the name of their lawyers names? And why would a media professional risk making any assertions on the case without evidence and risk pissing off the judge? Looks like someone has been watching the documentary on the Mormons and getting ideas on how to "pretend to be a lawyer."

      Delete
  25. I was just flipping thru some old court cases, and I found this. I thought you might like to discuss.

    Billy keeps ranting that all of his BS is protected by the first amendment. Except, taken as a whole, none of it has any social value, and it is all harassment and intimidation. Against all of his victims.
    From the Montana Supreme Court,

    https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17137779253126660832&q=montana+harassment+stalking&hl=en&as_sdt=6,27

    "Cooney's conduct inflicted injury on his victim and lacked any social value. We agree with the State's assertion that free speech does not include the right to cause substantial emotional distress by harassment or intimidation. The language quoted from Chaplinsky indicates that actual threats are not the only category of spoken words that do not receive First Amendment protection.
    We conclude that § 45-5-220, MCA, was not unconstitutionally applied in violation of the United States or Montana Constitutions.
    308
    *308 We affirm the judgment of the District Court."

    ReplyDelete
  26. LMFAO!! Windsor needed some drama and ego boosts, so he posts some video from 2 years or so ago from Curtis, and claims it's from the "Joeyisalittlekid gang." No, it's from Curtis. He is himself. Nice try Windsor! Oh, and seeing as it is so old, Rebecca may have just bitten off more than she can chew...as you alluded to this being something 'New' sent to you, and Rebecca has now made a false report to one of Marty's 3 letter fav's-- the FBI. hahahaha oh man!! Windsor should really be smacked by the Feds.

    "Rebecca McLaughlin-- Ok I sent a message to the FBI. My PHD education from Northcentral University partners with FBI in educating their employees ... agents ... Almost 4.0 student so hopefully they value my opinion! We are in a very dangerous business exposing judical govermental police corruption. Cheers! Getting ready to start my new teaching job. Who would believe that the FBI are guest speakers there!!! Lol. I sent evidence to Bill Windsor to confirm that is true. Confidential pics that can't be exposed online as it depicts the image and name of an FBI agent! Cheers!"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Hopefully they value my opinion". Uh Rebecca, I'm guessing no they don't. You're as crazy as Mary.

      Delete
    2. her Phd in education Pffft. She is giving a the FBI a diagnosis on Butler of "I am serious he would be diagnosed as dual diagnosis personality disorder and substance abuser".

      I am sure that the FBI has their own mental evaluation professionals that have degrees in that field verse someone with a Phd in education. SMH. Along with the fact that while Butler appears to be stressed out drinking a drink discussing his issues about Windsor on Camera. That's very normal. Then the issue of Windsor is now trying to cash in on making money off a pirated video that is not his and get them all to watch it. I have to say it's not kosher with adsense billy.

      Delete
    3. "Cheers"? Rebecca and Curtis could probably be big drinking buddies. I think she should've sent a message to Curtis instead, she'd have far more in common with him. "Cheers!"

      Delete
    4. I wonder if Jan Smith has a Phd too. Curtis may have, uh, issues but Jan needs to turn her little pointy finger around the other way. At any rate, like Rebecca, she doesn't realize she is 2 years too late.

      Jan Smith This is called counter transference. It is when someone has serious, significant, unaddressed problems and they put it off on you like you have it.

      Jan Smith Whatever state he is in right now, he needs to get reported to the crisis clinic as a danger to others. That is how this needs to get handled

      Jan Smith With him traveling across states, that is a good idea. However, he needs to go the a mental health facility for 48 hours for observation to get evaluated. This will get him into the system in a whole other way

      Jan Smith He is probably on social security disability which gives him the freedom to travel but not a lot of money. Border patrol needs his name and his mental state

      Jan Smith No and that is typical sociopath behavior. You dehumanize your victims and don't take responsibility for yours.

      Jan Smith He knows he has substance abuse problems and is clearly making a case that he can be a drunk and smoke if he wants along with other substances. It is highly likely that this is not the first time use has gotten him in trouble.

      Delete
    5. I have given certain lemmings cartoon voices. Helps me read their stuff because it's just to moronic to believe it's a real person writing.

      Like Jan here--I think she seems like a Sylvester the cat. Spit talking and all. Try it...

      Delete
    6. Hahahahahahaha. Thanks @ 5:39, best giggle I've had today.

      Delete
  27. Honestly, MaryD really needs to just shut the hell up! Every time she starts trying to compare herself to Windsor, it's just more proof of her mental instability--not to mention her inability to READ.

    Bill Windsor-- Here's the charge: “On or about the 30th day of December, 2013, the above-named Defendant committed the offense of violation of an order of protection when, with knowledge of the order, purposely or knowingly violated a provision of an order provided for in 40-4-121 or an order of protection under Title 40, chapter 15, to wit: ‘Defendant posted Boushie’s name on Twitter, a third or subsequent offense.’” Elsewhere, this is stated to be the posting of a video with the title: “Bill Windsor is banned from the University of Montana and Boushie. Corruption at its finest.”

    "Mary Deneen-- Dec 30, 2014 is the day I arrived in Missoula from out of state and went to the Federal Courthouse to obtain subpoena court forms for my USC 1983 Civil Rights / Discrimination, Liability, Personal Injusry case. Interesting they charged Bill (after he filmed me) for an alleged felony tweet that same day, Dec. 30, 2014..

    So no Mary. Windsor was already in hot water a YEAR PRIOR to your bullshit claim. You're not that important Mary. Really! Get over it. The courts did your children a HUGE favor by removing your manic, Munchausen mania from their lives.

    Oh--one more thing? Why do you keep posting the same things over and over on Windsor's FB? People KNOW!! My god, you've said it hundreds of thousands of times. Repeating it doesn't change the fact--it just reinforces the reasons the court deemed you unfit. Let that soak in if you can. Tell the ticks to take a nap if you have to, until you can comprehend.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is mind bending, isn't it? You know Windsor has those moments when he wishes she'd PTFD already. He'll have a comment thread kinda ½ assed flowing along and BAM! Here's MunchenMaryD with all by, thru, icons, violations, Lyme misdiagnosis, false arrests & lock ups... No wonder Windsor is so shakey! She'd rattle even his last nerve.
      Sweet, ain't it? They so deserve each other.

      Delete
    2. Munchie--"Further, MT also is charging Bill for a felony for sending an email notice (my sworn affidavit to U of MT legal counsel) for a federal defamation case of which I am also a victim of "intentional" defamation, libel, slander, intimidation, invasions of personal identifying info., and assault w/ veiled and vile threats by and thru a U of MT Dept. of Biological Sciences employee, Sean Boushie."

      What "Federal defamation case?" Is she really THAT stupid? No. No way. Can't possibly be. Then to go into her own alleged victim stance? Holy hell!

      First of all Munchie--there WAS NO FEDERAL DEFAMATION CASE. Second? SHUT UP!! You've got zip, zero, zilch on being a victim. Nope. Aint ever gonna happen. You are delusional. You have to grasp reality here Mary. Your buddy Cox? She's not your buddy. She set you up. Fact. Although you still aren't a victim of anything you claim, but however Mr. Boushie could file against YOU and COX!! In fact? I really believe he should. I actually think Mr. Boushie should get an order against not just Windsor but Lawless America participants in general, since they are diciminating false, malicious, defamatory information by and thru WINDSOR/LAWLESS AMERICA.

      Mr Boushie's name is trash on the internet all because of Windsor and Cox. I don't think there is enough money in Windsor's pot of gold that could cover all the damages but surely there is enough there to sway Windsor and his ilk from further harassments in the future towards people he doesn't like. Just a though.

      I'd specifically request a C & D from Munchie too. Possible mental check as well. Seems like a danger to herself and others by her easily manipulated mind--thus--filing false, frivolous and malicious complaints, affidavits, and court documents on the behest of one William M Windsor.

      Delete
    3. LMAO,"Tell the ticks to take a nap if you have to..."

      Delete
  28. " a third or subsequent offense.’” Elsewhere, this is stated to be the posting of a video with the title: “Bill Windsor is banned from the University of Montana and Boushie. Corruption at its finest.” " -Bill Windsor

    So what does Billy do, go back and edit the title on youtube to be inconsistent with the tweet history from topsy just search December 30-January 1st. LOL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, that was a smooth move by Mr InternetWindsor.

      Delete
    2. Well you know, between his raging diarrhea (of the mouth), a vowel movement here, and a crooked letter inserted there (and everywhere a court house is found) he was bound to slip up. Montana may not have him (court) house trained yet, and he could use a good flea bath, but at least they bought him a collar.

      Delete
    3. *** Who is Becky asking/talking to?
      ( "Rebecca McLaughlin - Anyone hear from Bill Windsor today?")

      *** 4 hrs later she answers herself lol.

      ("Rebecca McLaughlin - He's on the road today!")

      Delete
  29. Here it comes folks - Windsor's trial postponement ploy. Will it be 'closed head injury' ... 'Whiplash'? ....

    "Bill Windsor
    6 mins ·
    https://www.facebook.com/billwindsor1/posts/10207973564163511?pnref=story
    DOES IT COUNT AS AN ACCIDENT IF YOU HYDROPLANE OFF THE HIGHWAY INTO A 30-FOOT WIDE GRASS MEDIAN, AND MANAGE TO BRING THE VEHICLE UNDER CONTROL AND BACK UP ON THE HIGHWAY WITHOUT STOPPING?
    I've only been in one accident in my life -- a tiny fender bender when a little old lady stopped in the middle of the road trying to figure out where to turn into her church parking lot. That was just a few years ago, so I managed to be accident-free for a loooong time.
    I was driving down the Interstate in Montana today when thunderstorms hit. The next thing I knew, I had no control over the little rental car I was driving. I think I did a full 360, but it happened so fast that I'm not sure. I did remember that you are supposed to steer in the direction of the skid. I did, and managed to get control so I could bounce down the grass median ditch. I just kept driving and headed back up the median hill and onto the Interstate.
    I was in the middle of nowhere, which is basically all that there is in Montana, and there were no cars anywhere near me. Thank Heavens. If there had been traffic, it wouldn't have been a pretty picture.
    Perhaps God was trying to tell me to slow down when there's trouble. It worked in the car for the rest of the day. Not sure I know how to apply that to life."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Drunken Drama Queen Code of Conduct, Rule 1; Create complete drama at all times to appear interesting and call attention to yourself when, in reality, you're just drunk and bored."

      Delete
  30. "I was in the middle of nowhere, which is basically all that there is in Montana..."

    Windsor-speak translation: Places with fewer people than Bill Windsor prefers are unacceptable and inexcusable. Matter of fact, Montana is a dump. It's citizens are stupid (only Bill Windsor is smart) and ugly (whereas Bill Windsor is startlingly beautiful).

    Kinda funny. No one here can recall asking Bill Windsor to purchase a hilarious eBay bulletproof vest and come to Montana. Two Montana children are said to have seen Windsor waddling away from the courthouse.

    "Look. He thinks he's a TV."

    ReplyDelete
  31. A TV producer did file a motion to request cameras in the courtroom. The producer was named Bill Windsor. Not to be confused with the defendant William M. Windsor or the defense attorney Bill Windsor Esq.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Looks like Bill Windsor sent William Windsor the letter he posted on Facebook. Freaking dumb ass liar.

      Bill Windsor
      I will be publishing the motion and the case law, affidavits, etc. These should prove helpful to anyone else who wants to try to film their trial or hearings. AND, Whistleblower Productions could be the producer that applies. More on this in a LawlessAmerica.com article when time permits.
      Lawless America - Judicial Corruption and Government Corruption Exposed
      Lawless America - INjustice in America - Judicial Corruption, Government Corruption, and Dishonesty in Government
      lawlessamerica.com ·

      Delete
    2. Frank Lee BillsadickSeptember 18, 2015 at 9:01 AM

      So how exactly does he not lie? His word games are suffering as much defeat as his litigation. He's not even trying to be clever any more. How did this conversation with himself go exactly?

      A phone in each hand:

      BW "Hello, is this William Windsor"
      WW "Yes it is. Who's this"
      BW "My name is Bill Windsor and I am the producer/director of Billshit TV. I wanted to know if I can film your tweeting trial."
      WW "Why I'd be delighted"
      BW "Great, I'll file a frivolous motion in the morning for my unlicensed company Whistleblower productions. I've used this name before in MT, and they're too stupid to check my credentials--so I suspect they won't deny me.
      WW "Don't worry, I will sue them for you if they do. I know all the games to get my way...I look forward to working with you. I sense this is going to be a delightful relationship.


      "I was approached last week by a TV crew that wanted to know if I would support their efforts to film my trial. I told them I would be delighted."

      If this shit doesn't scream Mental evaluation I don't know what does!!

      Delete
    3. Billy is such a fat f-ing liar. He filed a motion on Sept 9 to be allowed to film his "trial of the century" HE DID >>> BILLY WINDSNORE HIS SELF!!! The motion also demanded that all cell phones and electronic device be banned from the entire courthouse, not just his courtroom, because "Boushie's co conspirators" used cell phone cameras to take photos of Windsnore inside the Texas courthouse, and to communicate his escape routes. The Judge has already told Billy that all his frivolous BS motions have been denied and any further BS would be thrown out.
      So, let me get that straight. Its ok for Billy to run around and film any victim he wants, in any place he wants, including their homes and personal workplaces, but its not ok for anyone else to take his photo in a public location? Right? yep, classic Billschit!

      Delete
    4. Being handcuffed in an elevator is an escape route? Lols. He's just mad that we know that happened and doesn't want anyone to see or hear it when it happens again.

      Delete
  32. I ran across an article about Windsor that I had not seen before. LMAO at few statements:

    "Bill Windsor began the film project Lawless America in 2005"

    "In short, Bill Windsor does not appear to “have an ax to grind.” He wants to save America."

    "Bill Windsor is an independent film and TV producer, and is part of the alternative media (i.e. no corporate sponsors or managers that have to “clear” his stories.)"

    https://patriotnewstwo.wordpress.com/category/bill-windsor/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interesting exchange between Windsor and a travel blogger in comments of this 2008 piece. Windsor is busted for being an a$$.

      http://www.vagabondish.com/why-i-travel-television-made-me-do-it/

      Delete
  33. Frank Lee BillsadickSeptember 18, 2015 at 9:10 AM

    I wonder if Windsor's phone call with the ACLU went down like his TV crew conversation. (Non existent)

    He said he spoke to a woman--alter ego perhaps?

    "THE ACLU IS CONSIDERING BILL WINDSOR'S CASE!"

    "I have contacted them a number of times over the last five years with no success. But today, I received a phone call. I had about a 15-minute conversation, and I have been asked to provide specific information, which I have now emailed. The woman said that she will be on the lookout for it and will provide the information to one of the attorneys as soon as she receives it."

    Sure fat boy...sure. Keep dreaming.
    If the ACLU was going to cover anything? They'd be covering the defendants who's free speech rights you were attempting to quash. 1000's for multi millions. Far more interesting of a case than some washed up old man who's anti government group is attempting to manufacture fake "evidence" to destroy the US with frivolous cases.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bill makes himself look like an even bigger clown every day.

      Delete
    2. ^^^^ Upon information and belief of course.

      Delete
    3. Frank Lee BillsadickSeptember 18, 2015 at 9:37 AM

      ContraDICKtory!! Lets see, in his "motion to film" from the post way back ^^^^ he wants everyone else to be banned from their electronic devices. Ok. BUT, he wants to film. AND, he wants the ACLU to step in because HE'S being "Denied his first amendment rights?"

      SMDH. Cue circus music. The "Trial of the Century" is simply Windsor World Unleashed--The worlds LARGEST circus.

      Delete
    4. Not Friends Of Bill WindsorSeptember 18, 2015 at 9:51 AM

      It's all just more smoke and mirrors from Bitler. The main point of an order of protection is to protect the victim. Windsor is full of shit if he thinks the ACLU will overturn ANYTHING regarding the "right to bare arms" when you have an order of protection against you. Not gonna happen, not ever. Glaring Billshit fact #1. Second glaring Billshit fact? Windsor is a stalker. Windsor is a liar. Windsor is NOT media, nor is anything he's claiming are his first amendment rights, first amendment rights. (of course this is really all about rules and laws and Windsor is allergic to those. Breaks out in vexatious litigation every time someone imposes any rules, restrictions or holds him accountable to the law)

      Bill Windsor-- "Thanks everyone. It's 2:11 am MDT, and I just emailed the requested information to the ACLU lady. It's such a crazy story. I hope I hit the high spots that will be important to them. The main point I made is that the Montana Supreme Court has ordered that Montana judges may take away a person's rights to (1) freedom of speech, (2) freedom of the press, (3) right to bear arms, (4) rights to due process."

      Nope. Not one Constitutional right has been violated for you Windsor. Not one. However, I do see the courts upholding the Constitution for other people's rights that you feel you have the right to trample on.

      Delete
    5. He's not nearly as important and "top of mind" to that prosecutor as he wants to believe he is.

      More like "Oh, and I should look at that crazy man's file after lunch"...

      #CrimeOfTheCenturyNot

      Delete
    6. Anyone can call the ACLU on their posted time each week. You speak not to a lawyer but an aid who asks questions. Mostly you will be told that they are not lawyers and can not get involved unless it is a Bill of Rights issue AND of public concern. Had they been interested, they would not need much from him because it is already all over the internet AND they would have posted their support for him on their facebook page, sometimes within hours of the event.

      Delete
    7. Oh and the ACLU relies on donations and support to fund the cases that they do take on, with an interest of protecting freedom for all of us.

      Delete
  34. Rebecca McLaughlin-- By the way what happened to the Lawless Anerica SUV? Or are you intentionally incognito?

    Bill Windsor-- SUV was wrecked by a "helper" in Dallas.

    Uh, no Windsor. Not quite. Jennie had a tiny fender bender right? It was barely noticeable but you needed to trade in your stalker mobile for a newer version. She was very helpful with a LOT of information. You paid cash for it didn't you? The entire thing? Put it in your trust? Oh, yeah--you think you've got a "LOT" going on? Just wait...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with @Spam, Clark seldom thinks of Windsor. Windsor cannot stop thinking of her and fretting.
      I also agree with @NFoBW. #ACLU? Bwahahahahaha!

      And Jennie? The 'hired helper'? Windsor really should be concerned about what Jennie says & who she says what to when she's out 'dancing' & drinking. #SmallWorldAfterAll
      I'll borrow P's wave ~~~ waving at Jennie~~~ bwahahahahahaha

      Delete
    2. Why should he care? Hearsay is irrelevant.

      Delete
    3. Kinda like your entire life right Susan.

      Delete
    4. SH is definitely not a small town girl. Hearsay is so relevant in some places. How fun would life be without out it, a fire pit and an ice cold beer with friends?? Jennie and Windsor may find out you can't keep secrets or hide you really are in a small town.

      Delete
    5. HAHAHAHA OMG!! Susan? Heresay? No you twit. Direct testimony. Obviously Windsor DOES care, otherwise you wouldn't have crawled out of your cript in the middle of the day to try and act all nonchalant.

      LMFAO!! Cha ching....dingaling!! expensive lessons...

      Delete
    6. Whelp, according to hearsay our troll has at least an 8 year history of turfwars and of spying on and trying to disrupt groups she does not agree with.

      Back in 2007, SVG joined the Women in Black to protest war, but only managed to declare a war on these other activists: (just like her Maryland Court Watch battled with Occupy Baltimore) and was described as deceitful. You can see her pic:

      http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1984853/posts

      SVG and the other Wibs did not get permission to screen The Vagina Monologues at a women's crisis center which makes it all the more suspicious that some money disappeared too:

      http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1980446/posts

      She has defended Bill and the toilet bomber against accusations that they are terrorists, but she says the tea party is a terrorist group:

      http://www.carrollcountytimes.com/cct-arc-4f423415-5a3c-57e3-9802-881d1a0fe09b-20131008-story.html

      So Sharon loves to play for both teams, calling out terrorists but not wanting to go to war, even though she fully supports Bill's revolution.

      http://warisacrime.org/node/26038

      So who is the real Sharon Galloway? Maybe we can find out from those who know her the best. Seeing as she never served one day in uniform and is NOT a veteran, and does not think military spouses and children deserve benefits-----what exactly does George McDermott mean when he calls his dear friend Sharon a Patriot?? And precisely how does one make more money fighting corruption anyway?

      http://makemoremoneys.blogspot.com/2011/05/secret-justice-fights-corruption.html

      Delete
    7. She has to play both sides. It doesn't take long after she "joins" a side before people get tired of her arrogance combined with stupidity. Her constant need to say I told you so gets on people's nerves really quick, especially when she was wrong but will try to claim "nuances" when back tracking to say she was right. She's an unlikable troll.

      Delete
    8. DAMN!! She is even more of a troll than I thought. What a fucking bitch! Con artist just like Windsor too. No wonder she was all uppity about how he didn't need to report donations and shit. No wonder she has such a miserable life. She pretends to want to do good, but she's just a greedy, corrupt POS. AND can't stand the Windsor competition--but can't stand the fact that good people are exposing them--so she has to bite her tongue to keep on the side of evil! Troll Bitch!!

      Delete
    9. "Bill Windsor-- I hired a woman to do data entry for me on the 50,000 Joeyisalittlekid defamatory comments. She did rescue my SUV, then wrecked it, and ceased responding to me after the Joeys b4egan physically stalking her."

      So, wouldn't Jennie be a "Paid Cyberstalker" per Windsor's claim? Tisk, tisk Jennie!! You're being thrown under the clown car by your ex-boss. He isn't going to save you--when he's publically admitting you were cyberstalking for him, AND you crashed his precious stalker mobile.

      Hope you told the detectives EVERYTHING--because Withholding information is a crime. Hoping you get a revisit now--based on this comment by your "Boss."

      Delete
  35. Lynn Maris-- Looks like Curtis is a security officer
    Rebecca McLaughlin-- Oh no does that mean he has a legal right to carry a gun?
    Lynn Maris-- Commissioned security officers have advanced training, especially in firearms. And yes, he can carry a gun.
    Lynn Maris-- It is really concerning because comparing Curtis from the past and then now - are drastic changes in his mood, personality, manner of speaking etc WHAT??? Comparing from then until now? Bitch please--the video your claiming in "NOW" was "THEN". Fricken morons!!
    Rebecca McLaughlin-- You know him?
    Lynn Maris-- I listened to his stuff... I dont want to know that loser
    Rebecca McLaughlin-- Oh.

    Rebecca McLaughlin-- A lunatic on the loose with a gun. How does that happen?. (because they claim they don't have one, then they claim it's not even with them, then they claim it's a violation of their 2nd amendment rights and whine to the ACLU--all while hiding it somewhere...)
    Bill Windsor-- same way wonderful mothers lose their children

    Hummm...Here we have Windsor--who refused to turn his gun in, who claimed he didn't have one, then claimed it was in GA with his wifeepoo, when he allegedly "Ceased being a resident of GA in April 2013" and went to get his gun permit in SD just prior to going to Montana to stalk Boushie. Pesky details....Oh, yeah, and how does a lunatic get a gun permit? Well, ask Lunatic William M Windsor. Don't believe he did get a gun permit/license. He's the poster child for the Anti NRA people, who want crazyassholes to be licensed--or better yet, not have a gun at all. (He's the kind of criminal who doesn't follow laws, or rules--you know, the kind of "criminal" who buys a gun from some thug) Windsor's warped sense of entitlement and lame excuses as to why he breaks laws is more concerning. He's the kind of whackjob to shoot, then claim self defense. Remember, he's advocated for cold blooded murderers to be free...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Once again, regarding Windsor's gun - You Be the Judge...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4yyqZzT1jA&spfreload=10

      Delete
  36. Replies
    1. Boo hoo, Billy...

      Delete
    2. Oh, the irony of Windsor and his Whackadoodles yammering about a video rant.

      Where's that gun, "The Judge", that a shaking, dizzy stalker bragged online repeatedly of owning? Who is it that travels from state to state stalking random people? Who is it with criminal trial upcoming for violating an Order of Protection?
      WINDSOR. William Michael Windsor.

      Delete
    3. So pesky, @Anon1:45pm! Giggle snicker snort!

      Delete
  37. BILL WINDSOR'S FELONY TWEETING CRIMINAL TRIAL HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 4-8, 2016.

    Let me be the first to wish you and yours a Happy New Year.

    I just received the order changing the trial date. I'm hoping the case will be dismissed, but if not, this is the date. I cannot conceive of anything that would change this date.

    Even though the trial date is postponed, the next two weeks may be the busiest I have ever had. I have appellant's briefs due in Texas (4), California (1), Idaho (1) as well as my response to Prosecutor Jennifer Clark's brief attempting to convince Judge James A. Haynes that a TEMPORARY Order of Protection that said it expired September 16, 2013 was valid for 547 days"

    SMH. Ridiculous. Facepalm ridiculous.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I <3 Jennifer Clark!
      Go #TeamClark!
      #ThatBrief

      Delete
    2. Me too, @Anon2:47, me too! Nothing sweeter than a woman attorney bitchslapping Windsor! Ms. Clark joins the ranks of the other rockstars that have walloped Willy!
      #ThatBrief

      Delete
    3. Yep, Clark the **supastar**. She just locked up to psychos this week for kiddie porn and one for trying to get it with a 12 year old, which was actually Detective Shermer posing as a 12 year old...Derrr.

      Hey Billy, Its pretty simple, even for you. Heres what is going to hang your ass. This one sentence can be the entirety of Ms. Clark's brief...

      40-15-302. Appeal to district court -- order to remain in effect
      (3) If a temporary order of protection or an order of protection issued by a court of limited jurisdiction is appealed or removed to an appellate court, the order continues in full force and effect unless modified by the appellate court.

      Delete
    4. Actually--Windsor doesn't need to reply to her brief. The Judge asked HER to present it, even though she already had. Windsor is ordered NOT to file anything else. He's got nothing new to tell them.

      Maybe the extra time for the trial, is in case the Feds are investigating and they are going to take over. Seems Windsor is way too giddy about the time, and in love with his frivolous filings so much that he can't seem to understand that his abuses are crimes. I will laugh my ass off if they come down on him like I am thinking they are.

      He's committed several federal offenses yet, he seems to be so blinded by his vengeance he can't fathom that maybe, just maybe when Clark mentioned the feds MIGHT...she was kind of giving him a hint to STFU. But, no one tells Windsor what to do...at least--not yet anyway.

      Here's to watching from the stands!! Something tells me that Windsor's last hurrah will be quite the scene. (that is, for everyone that isn't Windsor...)

      Delete
    5. Unless I'm missing a case Windsor filed, he 3 briefs due in TX by 9/30 and a petition due by 9/21.

      http://www.search.txcourts.gov/Case.aspx?cn=10-15-00092-CV&coa=coa10

      http://www.search.txcourts.gov/Case.aspx?cn=10-14-00392-CV&coa=coa10

      http://www.search.txcourts.gov/Case.aspx?cn=10-15-00069-CV&coa=coa10

      http://www.search.txcourts.gov/Case.aspx?cn=10-15-00199-CV&coa=coa10

      Delete
    6. January, IMO, does seem a long time considering a jury has already been chosen.
      Sniff? Sniff? Is that taxpayer money being saved wafting from Montana? 3 ½ months would for ample time for several thorough investigations. js...Perhaps Aagent MongeMoose Marty can assist! *giggle*
      Spin it Windsor! Oh! The Facebook updates for the next 90 days should be delightfully delusional!

      Delete
  38. Why even bother at this time. For real over 6 months on a tether. This prosecutor personally is very unprofessional. anyone who has an email battle with a prisoner, a battle of Frivolous motions during a declared stay and never files new charges for trying to change evidence on the internet. Personally maybe they are just messing with him for some unknown reason or they are just stupid and unable to control their guy on bond.

    Then we have Liar Liar Windsor who wants everyone to think he is writing all of these briefs he's sooooo busy. The california and Idaho cases have been closed so long it is past the time to file an appeal. But I am certain he will use the Jail card and plea to them about how he could not start one in Jail even though he started all the texas appeals in Jail.

    Then there is the Appeal of the Boushie federal lawsuit. Windsor asked for 2 extensions. I suppose eating burgers and fries are more important than actually filling on time there.

    Finally Windsor has not filed anything with the supreme court again. Of course he has told Montana that he has appealed. They seem to never check. He states all the time that he is appealing but never does follow thru. Sounds like the failed Movie, TV, Book doesn't it. He never followed thru with it. Not even those Grand juries they planned out for 5 months. LOL.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What makes you believe Clark has emailed Windsor? Cause he said so?

      Delete
    2. It sucks. But it is months of having him even a small tether, but one that's driving him mad nonetheless. When they are done with him there will be enough evidence to show why these laws he's exploiting are weak and why the should be strengthened. Thousands of people working in tandem have not been able to stop the abuse of the legal system by a madman. We need to fix this and we will.

      Delete
    3. Bingo, Miss Petunia.
      99% of what Billy posts is BILLSHIT. Can anyone confirm that his trial has been set back to Jan 2016? That may be Billshit, too

      Delete






    4. Pretty sure this is also Billshit. Pretty sure the Judge already ruled that ALL of Windsor's motions were frivolous.

      Bill Windsor-- If the judge doesn't dismiss the case on the fact that the TOP expired, there will then be a hearing on my motion to dismiss for lack of probable cause.

      Nope--it was not expired no matter how many times you say it.
      Nope, there won't be any hearings on your motions either because they are frivolous.
      There SHOULD be a hearing to declare you vexatious though. Your blatant abuses of the court are overwhelming, and the few more months you're free to continue flooding them with more Billshit is guaranteed.

      Delete
    5. Fleming,
      RE: Your comments - "This prosecutor personally is very unprofessional...or they are just stupid and unable to control their guy on bond."
      I challenge you to walk a day in the shoes of the LE, Prosecutor, Judges, etc. who have had to deal with Windsor.
      You haven't a clue as to the dedication and amount of work LE and CJ have put into this case.

      Delete
    6. Good points, Renee. And like it or not, Ms. Clark has to deal with Windsor just as she would have to deal with his attorney if he had one. LE and CJ can't pick their customers. They take them as they find them.

      Delete
    7. If Windsor had an attorney at least there would not be so many emails and motions. Windsor actually has an attorney representing him only when they have him in court. They should force Windsor to only submit all motions thru the public defender but once again they aren't doing that. This entire case is looking to be a circus just as Windsor likes it.

      Delete
    8. That pesky Constitution thing is probably a big part of Ms. Clark's inability to "control their man on bond" and why Windsor is not forced to submit motions through an attorney. Read the first 5 or 6 pages, then skip to page 10.

      http://open.wmitchell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2447&context=wmlr

      Delete
    9. Sadly the laws for VL's does not force them to be represented by an attorney, and Windsor would say it was a conspiracy. What step they can do is establish that the law needs to be changed in extreme situations because of someone extreme like him. What they can also do is establish his mental health and ask for a court mandated guardianship which would then require a lawyer assigned to him. They took a first step in that direction in the plea deal. His family should have been the ones to come forward for that. Windsor is the only one talking. Don't believe him.

      Delete
    10. I believe in South Dakota they banned him from representing himself because he IS vexatious.

      IMO--the DA should request that Windsor be labeled Vexatious. His filings aren't about defending himself--they are just an extension of his attacks on Boushie, and attempting to argue his fanciful and frivolous claims that have already been denied far too many times to count.

      He is trying to trip them up with all the filings. If he can bury them in paperwork, it appears he hopes they miss something, and he will then have merit to request a dismissal. They are playing right into his vexatious hands. It's a huge mistake IMO.

      Even in TX, Carroll noted Windsor's abusive filings, and tried to impose a type of prefilling injunction--however, due to the mass filings and recusal request--Windsor was able to bury his blatant violations--contempt--for the injunction, and forced everyone to answer other things because they were time sensitive.

      Windsor seems to be able to hone in on the weaknesses of the courts, knows they are bogged down, and thus, keeps bogging them down on purpose, just waiting for his chance to pounce. His other strategy seems to be to wear them down with his plethora of frivolous filings, in hopes they just get so annoyed they give up.

      Just like this comment he made to Glenn--where the courts get tired of Windsor--Windsor gets energized. They are feeding the monster!

      "Bill Windsor-- We have our own club, Glen. Kicking A$$ and Taking Names."

      Delete
    11. Who's ass has either of those two idiots kicked? #FUGG

      Delete
  39. Ohhh Emmm Geee! There are no words to describe the stupidity on Windsor's FB page. Some of the lemmings think the Charleston church shooting is a hoax. Like Sandy Hook. These comments are under Windsor's post about the arrest of the SC shooter's friend:

    Michael W. Lurie These hoaxes are getting out of hand....

    Matthew Orames So, trying to make them have proof evidence as most are won slim to none on getting justice. As the prosecutor wins on testimony all the time alone.

    Michael W. Lurie ...or on corruption. As in Sandy Hook.....so far.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That? Is some sick twisted shit.
      There must be a special place in Hell for any POS that spews venom such as that.
      It really is a shame that when there are horrific crimes such as S.C. And Sandy Hook, that these idiots couldn't just take the place of little kids & those worshipping in their church, since it's all just a "hoax".
      These are the scum sucking bottom feeders of society that Windsor panders his drama & hatred to. Windsor really is a teeny tiny, feeble individual to use complete imbeciles like Michael, Matthew, MaryD, Rebecca, Lynn and the rest of the lunar tuner menagerie as his ego boosters.
      Gag.

      Delete
  40. WOW !!!

    " Roy P Pilkey shared Bill Windsor's photo.
    If there is anyone following me and Lawlessamerica_bill Windsor and you have aspirations of going into Law, Law Enforcement, you want to be a Judge, or a Prosecutor of Human Beings, I would strongly suggest you follow the steps of Bill Windsor's wild journey in America. If you are JENNIFER CLARK, a judge, a prosecutor, or a cyberstalker, BE AFRAID, BE VERY AFRAID."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Who says mental illness isn't entertaining...?

      Delete
    2. I know, right? Much better than TV programming these days. BE VERY AFRAID! Yup. I was VERY AFRAID I was going to choke on my giggle snorts...

      Delete
    3. Not Friends Of Bill WindsorSeptember 19, 2015 at 9:52 AM

      So, is/was Windsor "Conspiring" with Roy too? Besides Cox et al and MunchieD?

      "Roy P Pilkey-- Here is where it all began, the first shot in front of the Ravalli Co courthouse. the cops came out and wanted to know why he had a bag on his head??? Didnt know it was the international signal for send in the troops we are in grave danger. You followed in the footsteps Bill Windsor right up to the vipers nest in Missoula"

      "Bill Windsor-- Ah Yes, I was assaulted twice and raped multiple times there."

      "Roy P Pilkey I've got to try and find the one from the Bitterroot Library, where JH's wife put mike in jail for asking for the Potus letter to be put on file. At the time mike did not know that my name on the letter was also very explosive, told him the rest of the story the other day, he about fell on the floor. His briefs and letters are still alive and dangerous to them, he set them up and you gotem. Thanks Bill the Nation is grateful, I hope we survive to meet some day."

      Seems those with an ax to grind with MT have been "Setting them up..." so to speak. Set up for what exactly? Hum? What exactly is their "Club" up to? The "Nation" is grateful? WTF? One Nation under Lawless Bill? Eff that!

      Delete
    4. @ Ninja: I was going to ask SF if he’s found any Montana law or procedure for pro se criminal defendants. The state may not have run into this enough to adapt yet, Windsor might be a land mark case in ways he can’t imagine.

      I agree, this is just an extension of Windsor’s initial strategy. That’s where his whole revolution plan fell apart after DC. The group was supposed to write all those letters to inundate the courts in every state on the same day with paper and prepare for their law suits. The lemmings didn’t see the big picture, then couldn’t or wouldn’t write the letters and complaints. He found something to wedge his foot in the court room door (Boushie, JIALK, etc), he dumped the lemmings’ tales of woe, took off on his own to show them how it’s done!

      Delete
    5. Wow. Don't know how I got that here, meant it for up there ^^^^

      Delete
    6. Personally, I think Windsor and his motivations are really simple. Everything he does is just an attempt at revenge on someone who pissed him off. He learned that by suing pro se, he could cause his enemies great expense and hassle. After Thrash issued the filing injunction, Bill thought he could no longer file a lawsuit anywhere. That's when the political party stuff started. He would attempt to seek his revenge by fighting the government that backed the judges that hindered his ability to use the courts to inflict hardship on his enemies. Once Bill found out he could file lawsuits, the political stuff got dropped and his entire focus became lawsuits again. He's well aware that he has no chance of winning the actual suit. He also knows that every page he files, someone has to read. That increases the cost and hassle inflicted on his target. That's what he's really after the entire time.

      Delete
    7. It's all good. I was digging around, looking for terms with criminal and vexatious litigants and found this link. So, Windsor claims the TOP expired. He's still sticking to that story. Interesting. Here is one appeal that was denied--so he knew it was still in full force. Also--there was a prefiling injunction place on him. Ok--so the criminal case is for violation of the TOP that WAS STILL IN FORCE--so wouldn't the prefiling injunction still stand even for the criminal case? It's all revolving around the same thing. If it doesn't cover his frivolous motions, filings etc, I would think the Judge can amend it to do so now. His history of abusing the court with his paper terrorism is WILDLY documented.

      https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2677872/boushie-v-windsor/

      Delete
    8. @ 10:14: Exactly.

      Delete
    9. Flooding the court with filings is his tactic. He's just carried it over to his criminal case. You know JC cringes every time he drops another pile of paper on the clerks counter. I'd bet he laughs all the way back to his room at the thought of her having to read his billshit. It's simple to just copy/paste another few hundred pages. It takes longer to read it than it does for him to assemble it. In his mind, it's a win every minute someone has to waste reading it.

      Delete
    10. I'm still stuck on Windsor claiming he's been raped! Raped? He said that! Wow!

      Delete
    11. Those DT's bring out some strange hallucinations, I tell you what...

      Delete
    12. *Sounds like a threat to me, I hope Roy, Glenn and the rest of these fringe lunatics that Windsor is feeding his BS to, are on Ms.Clark and LE's radar

      " If you are JENNIFER CLARK, a judge, a prosecutor, or a cyberstalker, BE AFRAID, BE VERY AFRAID."

      Delete
  41. Glenn is bragging that he pretended he was an attorney for a day. Why would you go to a meeting or whatever for all attorneys and act as one? Wonder what else he pretends to be.

    ReplyDelete
  42. C'mon, let's turn the page before our scrolling fingers fall off>>>>>follow me>>>>

    ℗ ♛ ❥

    ReplyDelete